Theos-Talk Archives (November 2008 Message tt00019)

Dear Anand

My views are:

Anand wrote:
"But I don't think there is sufficient
accuracy in so called Mahatma Letters to allow them to be called
letters from the Masters."

Answer by M. Sufilight:
I ask politely: So you are saying that none of the Mahatma Letters actually came from the Masters themselves?

I will have to disagree with that view based on my own clairvoyant investigations in the Akasha.

One thing is what we know. Another is what we believe or as you put it, - what we "think".
Some persons want to believe, that H. P. Blavatsky made a lot of mistakes. Others know, that she made what appears to others to be mistakes, but to the chela they appeared to be compassionate and wise activities.



M. Sufilight


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 5:39 PM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: A Second Invitation to Anand about Masters


  > But if SOME of the letters were NOT "containing Masters' thoughts" 
  > then there is another possibility that NONE of the letters contained 
  > Masters' thoughts for the simple reason that the Masters didn't exist.

  I won't say Masters don't exist. But I don't think there is sufficient
  accuracy in so called Mahatma Letters to allow them to be called
  letters from the Masters. It is possible that Blavatsky received
  glimpse of Masters' thoughts, then she put them in her own words, 
  materialized and told others that Mahatmas sent letters. Big problem
  caused by it is Mahatma's image is tarnished because of low quality of
  Blavatsky's writing in so called Mahatma Letters. 

  Anand Gholap



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]