Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00555)

But Anand they are so many possibilities but the thing is WHY?
 
WHY DO YOU THINK SHE SHOULD USE HER PSICHIC POWERS TO MISLEAD ANYONE? 
WHAT REASON COULD EXIST? 
 
ARE YOU MEANING THE LIFE WORK OF THIS HUMAN BEING WAS TO FAKE AND FORGEY, THAT WAS THE REASON SHE TRAVELLED, STUDIED, DEVELOPED,  INVESTED AND FOUNDED THE SOCIETY TO WICH YOU BELONG?
 
AND WHY DO YOU WANT TO PROOF SOMETHINK YOU HAVE NOT THE MINIMUN POSIBILITY TO PROOF BY PURE ESPECULATION?
 
Does your persistance means that any twisted thouth that goes throutgh your mind should be consider as truth by this forum?
 
Do you know some people on this forum thinks you are streching your imagination too much, at least you know something wich is real truth!
 
Raquel

--- El sáb, 18/10/08, Anand <AnandGholap@gmail.com> escribió:

De: Anand <AnandGholap@gmail.com>
Asunto: Re: Theos-World Were Mahatma Letters forgery?
Para: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Fecha: sábado, 18 octubre, 2008 10:02






Some people reported seeing Master while they received Mahatma Letters. 
But I think it was possible for HPB to create a form of the Master, 
show that form to people, and making them feel that Master had visited
them or met them. This I am giving you as one possibility behind
seeing Master physically or astrally. 
Just as Blavatsky could materialize letters, perhaps she could also
create a form of the Master, giving the impression to concerned
individuals that Master visited them and gave letter.
I know some people here will say that I am stretching my imagination
too much. But, I think, true researchers of such phenomena won't deny
such possibilities and will consider seriously before concluding that
real Master visited those individuals and handed over letters.
Best
Anand Gholap

--- In theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@ ...> wrote:
>
> Madam Blavatsky was adept in materializing letters and including her
> thoughts in them.
> Letters are received at different times and by different people. It is
> possible that even if the recipients were not close to Blavatsky, she
> could materialize them at different places. The point is, just as
> Blavatsky could materialize Mahatma Letters for A.P. Sinnett, she
> might have materialized Mahatma Letters for many other individuals
> also, even if she was not present at that place. 
> After Madam Blavatsky's passing suddenly most of the people stopped
> receiving Mahatma Letters. This thing also shows "significant role"
> played by Madam Blavatsky in materializing so called Mahatma Letters.
> 
> Best
> Anand Gholap
>

 













__________________________________________________
Correo Yahoo!
Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! 
Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]