Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00280)

Richard
Apparently, with reference to my ABC model -- all those interesting  
scientific cosmologies outlined below, refer solely to the 4th lowest  
frequency phase order (physical space-time) of the third fractal  
involution of the "spiritual" (1st logos) fields of cosmogenesis --  
that emanate and radiate, initially, out of the zero-point  
singularity of Absolute (pre cosmic) Space (See: http:// 
members.aol.com/leonmaurer/Chakrafield-spherical-col_3.jpg)

Therefore, if any of these theories are proved to be correct, they  
would seem to confirm the possible fractal involved hyper-spherical,  
smooth symmetry nature of the initial conditions prior to the  
appearance (emanation-radiation) of multidimensional (metaphysical- 
physical) holographic space-time... This fundamental nature of  
"Absolute Space" being, presumably, the infinite G-force spin  
momentum, or non linear (abstract circular) motion surrounding the  
empty (of form) or true vacuum at every zero-point of pure  
consciousness (potential awareness-will) located everywhere in Total  
Space.

Thus, Spirit or consciousness and Matter or substance (whether  
ponderable or imponderable) could be considered as the inherent dual  
(subjective-objective) characteristics of pre-cosmic Absolute Space.

Accordingly, I would take such theoretical scientific cosmologies to  
be a tentative confirmation of my ABC model of cosmogenesis.  (See:  
http://canonizer.com/topic.asp/23/13) ... Which -- in order to  
explain the universality, non locality, and power of will (coupled  
with awareness of information) to move and transform matter -- is  
based on the hypothesis that consciousness must be an inherent  
quality of Absolute Space, spread *everywhere* throughout non-metric  
(metaphysical) spirititual, mental, astral (metaphysical) hyperspace- 
time, and metric (physical) space-time.

This model, incidentlly -- by the nature of its essential fractal  
involved topological geometry (of overall multidimensional  
hyperspherical space-time) along with the universal laws of  
electrodynamics and thermodynamics, based on the fundamental  
(absolute) laws of cycles inherent in initial spin momentum -- would  
necessarily predict and underlie any proven *physical* cosmological  
theory.  In addition, it would also totally confirm the "Three  
Fundamental Principles of Theosophy"... (Which, in turn, predicts the  
ABC model.;-)

Best wishes,

Leon Maurer

On Sat Oct 11, 2008 12:21 pm ((PDT) Richard Ruiquest  
<"yanniru@aim.com"> wrote

The Role of Compactified Space in Nature,

a Union of String Cosmology with Quantum Information Theory

String Cosmology:

The existence of a megaspace, which I call M space, wherein our  
universe and presumably many others are embedded as 3D branes is  
inferred from two recent bodies of work in high energy theoretical  
physics which go beyond the standard model and solve some problems  
(hierarchy and cosmological constant) with the standard model.

The first is the 1999 work in string phenomenology by Lisa  Randall  
and Raman Sundrum which has expanded into well over a 100 papers  
since then, mainly devoted to the=2

0search for ?Large Extra Dimensions? at the LHC. Here is the abstract  
of one review paper, ?Large and infinite extra dimensions? by  V. A.  
Rubakov:

Abstract: The emphasis in the development of theories with more than  
three spatial dimensions has recently shifted towards ?brane world?  
picture, which assumes that ordinary matter (with possible exceptions  
of gravitons and other, hypothetic, particles which interact very  
weakly with matter) is trapped to a three-dimensional submanifold ---  
brane --- embedded in fundamental multi-dimensional space. In the  
brane world scenario, extra dimensions may be large, and even  
infinite; they may have effects, directly observable in current or  
forthcoming experiments. On the basis of simple field-theoretic  
models, various ideas in this direction are exposed at a non-expert  
level.

The second source of my inference comes from the Two Time Physics  
investigations of Izthak Bars and his students at USC. Quoting from  
his USC bio:

?According to the body of work in 2T-physics, there is more to space- 
time than can be garnered with 1T-physics. 2T-physics introduces  
additional one space and one time dimensions, which can coexist with  
the familiar 3+1 dimensions as well as extra space dimensions of tiny  
sizes known as Kaluza-Klein-type dimensions, but the new ones have  
very different properties. First of all, the extra 1+1 dimensions in  
2T-physics are not small. However, there are gauge symmetries that  
effectively reduce 2T-physics in 4+2

dimensions to 1T-physics in 3+1 dimensions without any Kaluza-Klein  
remnants. The reduction is not unique because there is an infinite  
variety of 3+1 embeddings in 4+2 dimensions

Thus Bars merely has to extend his theory from 1 to 3 extra space  
dimensions to support my inference of our universe being a 3D brane  
embedded in a larger 3D M space of forces that weakly couple to  
matter like gravity. He has responded to a query to this effect

?Yes, my theory admits any number of space dimensions. Limits on that  
number emerge from structures such as string theory, as you seem to  
be well aware of.?  I. Bars

Additionally, there are holographic properties of this model also  
from the work of Bar. To quote again from the USC bio:

?Similarly, even though according to 2T-physics a unique dynamical  
system in 4+2 dimensions generates a large variety of 1-time  
?shadows??, 1T-physics presents these ?shadows? in 3+1 dimensional  
space-times as different dynamical systems in terms of different  
Hamiltonians (different times)?.In this way 1T-physics misses the  
underlying relationship between the ?shadows? as well as the  
underlying properties (e.g. symmetries) of the higher dimensional  
space-time. Actually, it turns out that each ?shadow? is a  
holographic image that retains all the information of the d+2  
structure.?



So string phenomenology and more directly Two Time Physics  
extrapolates to the not

ion of two (3D+T) spacetimes. This reminds me of  Susskind?s original  
26d closed-string theory which I recall had two time dimensions, as  
well as particles with imaginary mass, for which it was rejected.  
However, I cannot now find a reference to support that memory. They  
all now refer to 25 space dimensions and 1 time dimensions. But I am  
encouraged from what I learned from John Baez that Richard Borcherds  
won the Fields medal for his work relating bosonic string theory, the  
Leech lattice in 24 dimensions, and the Monster group: That?s good  
enough for me to proceed with a Two Time String Theory.

My cosmology model of string theories is fundamentally bosonic and  
26d (dimensions), but with embedded SUSY 10d superstring cosmology.  
Briefly, bosonic M space is the result of inflation and  
compactification of 10 dimensions of the 26d in a primordial black hole.

26d primordial black hole -> T(Mtime)+3D(Mspace)+6d(Msubspace) + 16d  
black holes? where the 16d black holes are carried along in the  
expansion of 3D M space. The 16d then generate universes.

16d black hole  ->   T (Utime) + 3D (Uspace) + 12d (Usubspace)

The usual SUSY 10d superstring theory yields T + 3D + a 6d  
compactified subspace. So a model with a 12d compactified subspace is  
new and lacking theory. But I do not find that very disturbing  
because, as John Baez says, the 12 dimensions also relate to the  
Leech Lattice and the Monster Group. It would seem that the higher  
order space in which the 26d primordial black hole exists would be  
associated with the Monster Group.



Compactified space:

Now all the above is background. What I recently wondered is ?what  
became of all that compactified space?? The above 26d black hole  
cosmology has presumably 3 sets of 6d compactified spaces with one  
set in M space that is rather uncoupled from the other two in our  
universe. But the exact cosmology is secondary, because the same  
question can be asked of 10d superstring theory, ?What is the role of  
the 6d compactified subspace in nature??  I fail to find any answer  
in the literature.

Each point of compactified space of 6 (or 12) dimensions is a Calabi- 
Yau manifold. Wikipedia says the manifold is a torus; but string  
theorists have found it to be much more complex resulting in the so- 
called ?landscape? of string theory solutions. In fact, it seems that  
they have only considered the properties of the manifold. I say let?s  
rather consider ?what the collective properties of this discrete  
array of Planck-size particles of compactified space might be??.

Still a zero-order model of the manifolds is needed. To get one I use  
the essentials of Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG), which is usually  
thought of as a competitor to string theory, in which space is  
emergent from an array of Wilson loops (used by Polyakov to formulate  
the first string theories,) once they are generalized into spin  
networks (by Smolin). Smolin also first proposed that universes come  
from black holes. Just what the configuration of space was to begin  
with in the black hole could range from loops (that shrink in size)  
to more linear strings (that break up into pieces that then curl up).  
Either way, the zero-order model of each manifold is a loop or a  
number of loops, each having a spin vector.



The details of the manifold model are of course approximate. What is  
of importance is that compactified space can be modeled as a dense  
spin network of Planck-size particles with special properties not  
available to ordinary LQG space. What is really special about the  
compactified subspace is that it is likely to be massless; and  
therefore a Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC).

BEC media (like He at absolute zero) has no friction, no viscosity.  
To first order BECs can be described by a single wave function. BECs  
are said to behave like a single particle. That is, the spin network  
is totally entangled; and the 12d compactified subspace pervades our  
entire universe, just as hypothetically a 6d spin subspace of  
compactified particles pervades all of M space including our universe.



Quantum Information Theory:

There is much work on Quantum Information Theory (QIT). But at least  
in the US it

is all addressed to the engineering problems of quantum computing.  
There is only one physics QIT that I know of; and it is not available  
on the Cornell Archives http://arxiv.org/ or even in English. It?s by  
Boris Iskakov and only published in Russian.

Boris Iskakov is or was the President of the Slavic Academy of  
Science in Russia. According to an interview of him, his QIT predicts  
the laws of the conservation of probability for fluxes of matter,  
energy, and information. Perhaps this work is not recognized in the  
West because the solutions to the equations of QIT are described by  
him as a synthesis of science and religion. For example, they suggest  
that weak signals can leak back from the future as well as the past.  
http://quanthomme.free.fr/energielibre/systemes/DocumentsAura4.htm

The connection to compactified space is that his QIT is based on the  
existence of a gas of almost massless ~ 10^-40 g microleptons that is  
a BEC that carries information. His microleptons may be the  
compactified subspace of string theory. From a translation of his  
interview:



  ?What we are talking about in this case is no longer an ideal space- 
pervading fluid, but a quantum-granular structure of the space-time  
continuum, filled with whirling streams of polarized microleptons  
(including some virtually vacuum-born). Such an approach enables us  
to use the mathematical apparatus of quantum mechanics to describe  
the information-energy field. Moreover, relationships of a higher  
level of generalization are deriv

ed than the classical equations of Schrodinger. The new equations  
describe not only the movements of matter, but also the development  
of the totality of interconnections, signals, events, and processes.?


Quantum Wave Collapse:

Now that is a rather grandiose claim for Iskakov?s QIT. My  
supposition is that, if true, what it implies is that wave functions  
are the information that is carried on the particles of compactified  
space.  Whether those particles are more like a gas, a liquid or a  
solid, since they are a BEC, they provide for instantaneous wave  
collapse and interaction via virtual particles at the Planck scale-  
the scale of the spin manifolds.

Therefore everything that happens in the world happens in the  
discrete spin network of compactified space. I postulate that Brian  
Greene?s exact 2D solution to the equations of superstring theory may  
be the source of a space-distributed entanglement. His solution  
predicts a mapping of all information outside a closed loop, say at  
distance x from loop center, to points 1/x inside the loop. So  
infinity maps to the center of the loop. That could be the basis of  
entanglement- how every particle in a BEC knows instantly what is  
going on in the whole BEC- based on a 3D generalization of an exact  
2D solution.

In conclusion, whether our reality is virtual or not, it is all  
controlled by the algorithms of physics programmed into each particle  
of compactified dimensions at the Planck scale wherein virtual  
particle interactions enable the transfer of energy from collapsed  
quantum waves to physical particles. In this model the uncollapsed  
quantum waves exist as collective effects on the compactified spin  
subspace. Then eigenfunctions have real existence but carry along  
their own virtual particles. For example, EM waves carry along  
virtual photons that then interact with the virtual particles within  
the spin manifolds once the waves are collapsed. The collapse is  
instantaneous, a property of the BEC nature of compactified space.  
Saying that all this is real or virtual becomes a matter of semantics  
or even taste. But clearly information is fundamental.=


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]