Theos-Talk Archives (October 2008 Message tt00038)

If she did, she gave us more and more clearness in past and future by 
that letters.

Even it is not important who wrote the letters but important is ; 
what is in it. 
In other words what we have on them.
And I cannot think that she wrote all from her thump.
Also if she did, she gave very forsighted information.

By te way I don't need demonstration for understanding Science.
Materializing is knowledge in science of Akás.
Christina.


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
>
> Blavatsky could materialize cup and saucer using occult powers. She
> also might have materialized Mahatma Letters. Most people in the
> Theosophical Society assume that all Mahatma Letters are genuine
> messages from the Masters by giving reasons that handwriting 
matches,
> they appeared in miraculous ways etc. But the fact is just as
> Blavatsky materialized cup and saucer, she could materialize Mahatma
> Letters. And to support Blavatsky's own opinions, she materialized
> Mahatma Letters carrying her own thoughts. This possibility is not
> considered by even most studious members of the TS.
> Style of writing and contradictions in Mahatma Letters suggest a
> strong possibility that many of the Mahatma Letters were not having
> thoughts of the Masters, but were carrying thoughts of Blavatsky
> pretending to be thoughts of Masters.
> Best
> Anand Gholap
>