theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Theos-World Re: Daniel, why don't you warn readers about Blavatsky's mist...

Sep 26, 2008 11:37 PM
by Drpsionic


100 years ago science was barely out of the stone age.
 
Chuck the Heretic
 
 
In a message dated 9/26/2008 7:34:10 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
silva_cass@yahoo.com writes:

 
 
 
100 years ago science had a slightly different opinion.   How did  it get 
that way - because or a causal cause

Cass

----- Original  Message ----
From: "_Drpsionic@aol.Drp_ (mailto:Drpsionic@aol.com) " <_Drpsionic@aol.Drp_ 
(mailto:Drpsionic@aol.com) >
To: _theos-talk@yahoogrotheos-t_ (mailto:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com) 
Sent:  Thursday, 25 September, 2008 4:05:19 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re:  Daniel, why don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's mist...

But that  is exactly what happened and there is nothing occult about it. The 
only  question is how did it get that way.

Chuck the Heretic

In a  message dated 9/24/2008 8:02:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
silva_cass@yahoo. com writes:

Suppose an Occultist were to claim  that the first grand organ of a cathedral 
had come originally into being  in the following manner. First, there was a 
progressive and gradual  elaboration in Space of an organizable material, 
which 
resulted in the  production of a state of matter named organic PROTEIN. Then, 
under the  influence of incident forces, those states having been thrown into 
a phase  of unstable equilibrium, they slowly and majestically evolved into 
and  resulted in new combinations of carved and polished wood, of brass pins  
and staples, of leather and ivory, wind-pipes and bellows. After which,  
having 
adapted all its parts into one harmonious and symmetrical machine,  the organ 
suddenly pealed forth Mozart's Requiem. This was followed by a  Sonata of 
Beethoven, etc., ad infinitum;its keys playing of themselves and  the wind 
blowing 
into the pipes by its own inherent force and fancy. . . .  . What would 
Science say to such a theory? Yet, it is precisely
in such  wise that the materialistic savants tell us that the Universe was 
formed,  with its millions of beings, and man, its spiritual  crown.
HPB

Cass

----- Original Message ----
From:  "_Augoeides- 222@Augoeides- 2_ (mailto:Augoeides-From:  "_Augoeides- 2
<_Augoeides- 222@Augoeides- 2_ (mailto:Augoeides-_Augoeides- 222@Augoei>
To: _theos-talk@ yahoogrotheos- t_ (mailto:theos-To: _theos-talk@ yahoogrotheo
_theos-talk@ yahoogrotheos- t_ (mailto:theos-_theos-talk@ yahoogrotheos-
Cc: _Drpsionic@aol. Drp_ (mailto:Drpsionic@Cc: _Drpsionic
Sent: Wednesday, 24 September, 2008 7:05:06 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World  Re: Daniel, why don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's  mist...

Chuck,
OMG!!!! Are you implying that Mt. Meru is made of  Granulated Uncertainty 
Particles and Pebbles??? Is there a relation to the  Uncertainty Principle in 
modern Physics???? If the Universe is built by  Uncertainity Particles that 
means 
we are intrinsicely and immutably and  irrevocably all composed of 
Uncertainity Itself!!! Could that be why we  argue so much about anything and 
everything?? ? The very Air we breathe  must also be composed of vast numbers 
of 
Uncertianty particles that are  certainly uncertain where they came from or 
where 
they are going!!! OMG we  don't have even a single Atom of Certainty in our 
entire body!!!! Could  there also be an Uncertainity Doom Theory???

Regards, 
John  (uncertain about that)

------------ -- Original message ------------ --  
From: Drpsionic@aol. com 
If Theosophy is anything, it is ambiguous.  The cosmos is built upon 
uncertainty.

Chuck the Heretic

In a  message dated 9/23/2008 7:36:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
silva_cass@yahoo. com writes:

Theosophy is a philosophy not a  religion and as a philosophy it must be 
coherent and without ambiguity.  Leadbeater brought ambiguity into theosophy 
by 
preaching opposing  dogma to what was stated by the originators. Dugpas are 
Masters of  Uncertainty!

Cass

----- Original Message ----
From: Martin  <_Mvandertak@ yahoo.Mva_ (mailto:Mvandertak@ _Mvandertak@ >
To:  _theos-talk@ yahoogrotheos- t_ (mailto:theos- To: _theos-talk@ yahoog
Sent:  Tuesday, 23 September, 2008 8:40:10 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Daniel,  why don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's mistakes ?

Aren't we  all believing in lies and half Truths?
Theosophy is wisdom of the gods it  is said; if we want to believe in the 
Truth we need to go for  Ethymo-sophia or the wisdom of the Real or reality 
and 
not some poxy  stuff about gods, philosophers and scientists. Reality is now 
and not in  the past nor the future; we can use the now springboarding into  
eternity.
If there was so much truth in theosophy, why are people still  discussing it 
instead of launching new ideas coming from the same source  and developing 
f.i. anthroposophy and alike science...

--- On Tue,  9/23/08, Cass Silva <silva_cass@ silva_cass> wrote:

From: Cass  Silva <silva_cass@ silva_cass>
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Daniel,  why don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's mistakes ?
To:  theos-talk@yahoogro ups.com
Date: Tuesday, September 23, 2008, 2:23  AM

Daniel 
Anand will never admit that Leadbeater got it wrong  because he would then 
have to admit that he (Anand) has spent 40 years in  believing in lies.

Cass

----- Original Message ----
From:  Anand <AnandGholap@ gmail.com>
To: theos-talk@yahoogro  ups.com
Sent: Monday, 22 September, 2008 7:05:53 PM
Subject: Theos-World  Re: Daniel, why don't you warn readers about 
Blavatsky's mistakes  ?

Subject of Theosophy, as understood by world and students  of
Theosophy, is complex. When I read messages of students of  Blavatsky
and messages of students of CWL, I find that what they  understand
Theosophy and it's main concepts is very different. That  means
Theosophical understanding of students of Blavatsky is different  from
understanding of students of Leadbeater. Differences are big and  on
important topics. It is possible that HPB and CWL had same meaning  in
mind but expressed that in different words. But their impact  is
certainly different on people. If somebody is referring Theosophy,  I
might ask "are you talking about Theosophy of Blavatsky or are  you
talking about Theosophy of Besant-Leadbeater ?"
Similarly reactions  of westerners and Christians to Theosophy depend
on what they consider as  Theosophy. When they consider Blavatsky's
writing as Theosophy, they  ridicule, hate Theosophy. Such hatred is
not expressed by those Christians  who consider CWL's writing as Theosophy.
I have come to a point where it is  necessary to make clear distinction
between Theosophy of Leadbeater-Besant  and Theosophy of Blavatsky. As
these two are different and have different  effects on people, I feel
that such distinction is very necessary. It is  because we often come
in contact with students of Blavatsky not agreeing  with students of
Leadbeater and CWL-students ignoring Blavatsky's writing.  
I am also feeling a need of writing article making it clear  which
Theosophy I support and which Theosophy I reject. I agreed with  CWL,
but I did not agree with Krishnamurti. I felt Krishnamurti' s  teaching
would do damage to humanity. So I rejected openly K's teaching,  just
as Catholic church openly rejects abortion and gay marriage.
I feel  that I should now write article on which Theosophical ideas I
support and  which Theosophical ideas I reject.
Best
Anand Gholap

Make the  switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7 Mail! 
___http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _ (_http://au.yahoo._ 
(http://au.yahoo./)  /) _  (__http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _  
(_http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)   /) /) com/y7mail

[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]

Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7  Mail! 
___http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _ (_http://au.yahoo._ 
(http://au.yahoo./)  /) __http://au.__ (http://au._/)  (_http://au./_ (http://au./) ) _ 
(__http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _ (_http://au.yahoo._ 
(http://au.yahoo./)  /) com/y7mail) 

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]

************ **Looking for  simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges? Check out  WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips 
and 
calculators.  (__http://www.walletpo_ (http://www.walletpo/)  _ 
(_http://www.walletpo_ (http://www.walletpo/)   /) p.com/?NCID= 
emlcntuswall0000 0001)

[Non-text portions of this  message have been removed]

[Non-text portions of this message have been  removed]

Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email. Get Yahoo!7  Mail! 
__http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  _http://au._ (http://au./)  _ 
(_http://au.yahoo._ (http://au.yahoo./)  com/y7mail) 

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]

************ **Looking for  simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges? Check out  WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips 
and 
calculators. (_http://www.walletpo_ (http://www.walletpo/)   p.com/?NCID= 
emlcntuswall0000 0001)

[Non-text portions of this message  have been removed]

Make the switch to the world&#39;s best email.  Get Yahoo!7 Mail! 
_http://au.yahoo.http://au._ (http://au.yahoo.com/y7mail) 

[Non-text  portions of this message have been removed]


 




**************Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial 
challenges?  Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and 
calculators.      (http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


           

[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application