Theos-Talk Archives (September 2008 Message tt00073)

Dear Anand and all readers

I have been reading the emails in this thread.
I have a somewhat different view than those who so far have emailed in this thread.


I find that there is another much more likely view than hitherto mentioned.
The problems of pshychology in HPB's personality, are n ot problems accroding to the DEAD LETTER. They appear to be problems to the average theosophists or seekers. To others they appear to be DESIGNS made by an initiate. Please let us not confuse the content to be the beholder.

Any initiated Sufi operates through DESIGN's.  They act or perform almost like actors in a play. Their act is done out of compassion. Why they sometimes act strangely the ignorants do not know. After a DESIGN is performed, a MEASUREMENT is taking place. After that a new and maybe totally different design may take place.


Listen carefully:
What you may take to be attractive, or even spread out by us
to be attractive to you, may well not be intended in this manner at
all. That which attracts you, or others, about us may be that
which is laid down by us as a tool which enables us to regard
you (or others) as unsuitable.

So what Subba T. Row and W. C. Leadbeater found attractive about HPB was not always, what she and Master intended to be attractive. Do you understand what I am saying?


Any initiated Sufi operates through DESIGN's. That is why their behaviour not always are operating in accordance with - better-knowing Ignorant average Seekers - who find themselves to be more wise than all aliens from a nearby galaxy. Their behaviour seeks to provoke the theosophical experience in the Seekers mind. By doing like she did, HPB provoked - the psychological problems in C. W. Leadbeater's and others DEAD LETTER readers minds, so that their - betterknowing attitude could be cleansed.

Because W. C. Leadbeater never considered Mahatma Letter no. 10 to be true.
This despite H. P. Blavatsky's many warnings about this issue in articles, the Secret Doctrine,  and various letters.

Do you follow me this far Anand?



M. Sufilight




  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Anand 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 1:17 AM
  Subject: Theos-World Re: Anand: "I have not read any better explanation." ??????


  Daniel
  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell"
  <danielhcaldwell@...> wrote:
  >
  > Anand,
  > 
  > Concerning the 1885 Leadbeater letter published
  > on my Blavatsky Archives website at:
  > 
  > http://blavatskyarchives.com/anoncomplex.htm
  > 
  > you write:
  > 
  > ------------------------------------------
  > Many serious students of spirituality found big problems in
  > personality and work of Madame Blavatsky. This letter of Mr. C.W.
  > Leadbeater seems to explain that incredible complexity. If this letter
  > is not accepted, there is required some other explanation of her
  > complex personality and work. I have not read any better explanation.
  > This is most surprising information to students of Theosophy.
  > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/45737
  > ------------------------------------------
  > 
  > Well, Anand, there is at least one "other explanation" and
  > I would suggest that it is a "better explanation" than the
  > one apparently given by T. Subba Row via C.W. Leadbeater.
  > 
  > It is the explanation given by Mahatma Koot Hoomi and Mahatma
  > Morya.
  > 
  ...........

  I read the letter of Master K.H. It does not make CWL's explanation
  invalid. Master K.H. supports CWL's words "terrible ill-tempered,
  ignorant old Tibet woman" by telling about serious problems in HPB's
  pshychology. And he also confirms that that soul is from Tibet, just
  as CWL called her Tibet woman.

  Best
  Anand Gholap



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]