Theos-Talk Archives (September 2008 Message tt00058)

Hi John,

Yes your reference to Geoffrey Barborka's book "H.P. Blavatsky, Tibet 
and Tulku" is good.

I would suggest that Anand and other interested readers carefully 
read and study Mr. Barborka's book so that they will be better 
informed on HPB and not naively accept or reject what C.W. Leadbeater 
reported concerning T. Subba Row's 1885 view of Madame Blavatsky.

For ordering options, on Mr. Barborka's book, see:

http://blavatskyarchives.com/barborkabib.htm

Daniel
Blavatsky Study Center / Blavatsky Archives
http://blavatskyarchives.com






--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Augoeides-222@... wrote:
>
> Daniel and all,
>    Just my personal view. The established rapport that joined the 
Master to H.P.B. was for eternity and not enabled to dissolution.
> 
> 
> >>>"We have not abandoned her [HPB]; she is not 'given over
> to chelas.' [as both A.P. Sinnett and T. Subba Row were contending 
at 
> the time!!!] She is our direct agent...." <<<
> 
> Citation: Tibet and Tulku, Chapter XVI, Page364:
> 
> " Why, such an extravagant, seemingly useless tirade as contained 
in the letter? Because, the hour is near; and that after having 
proved what I have to, I will bow myself out from the refined Western 
Society and  ------ be no more. You may all whistle for the 
Brothers.  ------Gospel."
> 
> (Letter to A. P. Sinnett, March 17, ( the Pythagorean Number) 
1882 )   
> 
> 
> Chapter XVI deals with the modes of Avesa (how and in what manner 
and degree projection of consciousness and occupancy by the Adept or 
Master can take place). My view is this is helpful to understand the 
circumstance of Madame Blavatsky. 
> 
> Regards,
> John