Re: Theos-World Alice A. Bailey and The United Nations - The Word made FLESH!
Jul 31, 2008 05:49 AM
by Morten Nymann Olesen
Dear John
My views are:
Thank you John for your very thoughtful reply.
I have in the below sought to answer you to my best abilities.
John wrote:
"What people can do is self educate themselves on what really exists such as what is real about Catholics and the Present time Catholic Church. What is the Society of Jesus? What is the Lucis Trust?"
M. Sufilight says:
I agree so very much.
John wrote:
"I don't think for a second that the Jesuits Run the Catholic Chuch."
M. Sufilight says:
Perhaps they aught to be called "false Christians" instead. The "Jesuits" or false Christian's teaching are the same as given by Rudolf Steiner in "From Jesus to Christ", oct. 1911 ( http://wn.rsarchive.org/Lectures/GA/GA0131/19111005p02.html)
Saying that the teaching as they were given by Ignatius Loyola have nothing to do with what Rudolf Steiner mentions in the above lecture I will simply have to disgree with you on. And perhaps we should let i rest there. - You just try and google what the teaching really is. Surface study is not enough.
John wrote:
"It is glaringly naive to assign such ideas. "
M. Sufilight asks:
Why?
John wrote:
"Perhaps you might write your personal views the each of the Members airing your many woven ideas. And I am not impressed by Masonic Degree's, read the Fee Schedule for the Degree's. The Rev. Sauneire has been revealed to be fraudulent and to have distributed false facts and claims. He is not a currently accepted source of truth to my personal knowledge. "
M. Sufilight says:
I did not say anything like that, did I?
In fact I agree with your view more than I disagree.
Underestimating the influence of various Freemason-like groups of a militant Christian kind is not something I would like to be supporting.
John wrote:
"The Caliphate was peaceful because if you opposed it they cut off your head, imprisoned you,, impaled you, or exiled you from the Caliphate. In todays world and in most Nations such practices are unacceptble except in totalitarian nations."
M. Sufilight says:
I find this view you give me to be a primitive one, just following suit with the massmedias and not with reality.
But, I agree they, "the Caliphates", aught to moderate some of their inhumane Caliphate laws. Yet so aught a great number of self-arrogant and ignorant corrupt western countries. They just have other inhumane laws, which some westerners call humane. Free prostitution, porn, narcotics to mention a few. Cultrual Imperialisme to name one more. - I tell you when you start digging more deep into this than the biased massmedias and biased Christian nurtured scholars promote, you will find a quite different perspective. Please do not undersestimate the remaining fragments of emotional Christian vibrations in the aura of the many western theosophists. Your own aura included.
John wrote:
"I also differ in regards to the Lucis trust from your view. You prefer you devalue and ignore the Professional Profession of Diplomats and the The Laws of nations and all the other real trappings of real work done by many ten of thousands of people in all the Nations of the World whose work and efforts obtain much Good in spite of the many perpetual distresses of the world at large. I cannot imagine that if you wroteSecretary'se Ministers, Foreign Secretarys, Diplomatic Ambassadors, of all beliefsions and told them your beleifs that you would find outstretched hands and happy welcome smiles. "
M. Sufilight says:
I wonder what you answered was regarding. I do not understand this answer.
Maybe the following will be helpful.
- I will always devalue the CHRISTIAN Professional Profession of Diplomats. That is what I am saying. And other Christians with other positions included. Maybe you misunderstood something in my previous email.
And please remember, that I do not agree on all or anything above 70% of the content of the link at FreemasonryWatch, which I offered you in my previous email. That was why I suggested, that you read that link between the lines.
John wrote:
"I don't personally hold a great respect for the United Nations, it's corrupted membership, it's stalemated organization, it's huge waste of monies which America pays the lion's share of only to receive insults from benficiaries who demand even higher levels of aid."
M. Sufilight says:
I agree much with this view. That was why I e-mailed about Alice A. Bailey's stance on the issue. Because I found it to be way out of line with the present day realities! And in another sense out of line with theosophy as it was given by H. P. Blavatsky.
John wrote:
"Again, just because people invent some innane supposition deosn't make it true or in any way factual."
M. Sufilight says:
I agree. That was my point.
I added it to the email because I thought it was easy to spot the problems something like this by Alice A. Bailey would have today. You know, that Alice A. Bailey groups have ten times the members as T.S. have or even much more. And they claim that they are following the teaching by H. P. Blavatsky, - but that those given by D.K. through Alice A. Bailey are better and more in line with the new times.
John wrote:
"I posted those Links for the United Nations so members here have the option to read what is Real against what is muttered by unhappy individuals. "
M. Sufilight says:
Again. Thanks John.
And still I believe all members at Theos-Talk know, that Google or other Search Engines exist.
M. Sufilight
----- Original Message -----
From: Augoeides-222@comcast.net
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 11:37 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Alice A. Bailey and The United Nations - The Word made FLESH!
Morten,
Well I am not much inclined to argue endlessly "straw" issues that people use to advance an agenda. I don't consider it mature or productive from my POV.
I didn't care to read Alice Bailey or Annie Besant as they were both away from H.P.B. in my personal view. Annie Besant was a committed Communist before she arrived to Theosophy or met Blavatsky. I consider that she knew an opportunity to use Theosophy to advance those causes. I never admit that Communists can throw away the tenets they hold dear at the drop of the hat. It isn't out of the ordinary for she and Leadbeater to procure whatever vestiges that come their way for what they consider a means to an end. Nor is it different today on this forum or in the real world. What people can do is self educate themselves on what really exists such as what is real about Catholics and the Present time Catholic Church. What is the Society of Jesus? What is the Lucis Trust?
It is sport today to foment hatred of America so what's new? That doesn't mean what's said is true. My definition of Jesuit is "Society of Jesus" because that is what it is, not what someone invents as a euphemism or a generality, rumor, fancy, or hateful distortion. H.P.B. used ways she wanted to use for her reasons that surely doesn't mean mankind must become preoccupied, fixated, paranoid shizophreniac and engage in mass delusions, warps, distortions of empirically observable reality&;of the present time actual world. Only neurotic immature juvenile mentally challenged people accept such nonsense. I don't think for a second that the Jesuits Run the Catholic Chuch.
Anyone can Google Image "Ignatius Loyola"and read what is the Society of Jesus and actual real history.
>>>Yes. And it is interesting that Alice A. Bailey only really pointed her fingers at Soviet as being totalitarian among the members of United Nations.<<<
Actually both Blavatsky and the Mahatma's long before Bailey indicated that the Communists were Abhorrent to Theosophy. And The Soviets were joinned by the Chinese Maoist Communists both having Permanent Veto power. France under DeGaul targeted their ICBM's on America not Russia or China, despite the fact that 100,000 American soldiers were buried on French soil. France also had the Permanent Veto.
I don't find agreement with your perception in regards to the U.N. Security Council Permanent Members. It is glaringly naive to assign such ideas. Perhaps you might write your personal views the each of the Members airing your many woven ideas. And I am not impressed by Masonic Degree's, read the Fee Schedule for the Degree's. The Rev. Sauneire has been revealed to be fraudulent and to have distributed false facts and claims. He is not a currently accepted source of truth to my personal knowledge. The idea that the Masons or other "cryptic" orders of organizations exert such influence is first laughable, then insane lol!
The Caliphate was peaceful because if you opposed it they cut off your head, imprisoned you,, impaled you, or exiled you from the Caliphate. In todays world and in most Nations such practices are unacceptble except in totalitarian nations.
I also differ in regards to the Lucis trust from your view. You prefer you devalue and ignore the Professional Profession of Diplomats and the The Laws of nations and all the other real trappings of real work done by many ten of thousands of people in all the Nations of the World whose work and efforts obtain much Good in spite of the many perpetual distresses of the world at large. I cannot imagine that if you wroteSecretary'se Ministers, Foreign Secretarys, Diplomatic Ambassadors, of all beliefsions and told them your beleifs that you would find outstretched hands and happy welcome smiles.
As far a "Sponsors" I don't know the ground that that defines or the significance it communicates in real terms. Sponsors can mean many things. It is too vague. As I said previously, people will attach to what can advance a personal objective.
I can't again find agreement that the U.N. was somehow a creation because of Alice Bailey or her authorship after all there was the League President Woodrowced by the U.S PresidentWoodrow Wilson which established a preceis at even thoughQuixoteled.I t isa case of Don Quihote flaying at the windmill
of advancement of mankind by screaming the change is evil. I don't personally hold a great respect for the United Nations, it's corrupted membership, it's stalemated organization, it's huge waste of monies which America pays the lion's share of only to receive insults from benficiaries who demand even higher levels of aid.
I can't imagine what you mean here :
>>>The United Nations has long been one of the foremost world harbingers for the "New Spirituality" and the gathering "New World Order" <<<
Again, just because people invent some innane supposition deosn't make it true or in any way factual.
Nobody I know would ever consider that the real world be aligned to Theosophical Literature for actual practice. Hamlets Mill still turns.
I posted those Links for the United Nations so members here have the option to read what is Real against what is muttered by unhappy individuals.
If a person were in College and studied Psychology they would receive an outline of the History of Psychology and the Noteworthy Contributors to it. Alice bailey would not be there.
Regards,
John
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@stofanet.dk>
To all readers
My views are:
Thanks John.
Well...I might be older than you expect. :-)
1. Brainwashing, Emotional Cults, Psychology and Alice A. Bailey
The interesting thing is that Alice A. Bailey died physically in 1949.
And that it was only after her death, that psychologist and science began officially to recognize "Brainwashing" and the talks about emotional cults and sects, and other psychological and social psychological issues.
Because of that it is fair to say, that Alice A. Bailey's books - today - are lacking heavily in content and level, when we talk about psychology and also esoteric psychology. Even so Alice A. Bailey wrote volumes about her "Esoteric Psychology". Yet psychology is wast subject so she can be excused to a certain degree.
2. The Jesuits
John wrote:
>>The West never said "We are not Jesuits". <<
Agreed, not literally and not easily visible. But they employed a political program to make it publicly clear, that brainwashing had taken place and that it was not USA, who did something as evil as that. Later the CIA programs was unwillingly uncovered and admitted. - The word "Jesuits" is used with the meaning false black Magic Christians.
3. About CHINA and Christianity
John wrote:
>>"China is part of the equation in world economics but when the shoe drops they are Totalitarian Authoritative Communists to the core above all else and they are strongly still pursuing expansionism having obtained the roof of the world Tibet, parts of India, the Paracel islands, th Sprately Islands, and other localities beyond every previous Chinese dynasty's prior borders. There is a great deal more that could be said but not here."<<
Yes. And it is interesting that Alice A. Bailey only really pointed her fingers at Soviet as being totalitarian among the members of United Nations. The Republic of China was problably without influence or importance in her day. She hardly mentioned it. So the only permanent member of the Security Counsil, which problably - not - was controlled by the Christian Freemasons was Soviet. And that is the key. Alice A. Bailey was married (in a Christian Church?) to a 33th degree Freemason of the Scottish Rite. (Martinism are closely related to this. And Sauniere from Rennes Le Chataeu was a Martinist). And we know from H. P. Blavatsky that almost all Freemasons are entangled with the Jesuits teachings. Well, almost. So therefore the more reason to be careful about what Alice A. Bailey wrote.
4. Why Alice A. Bailey left out Islam
The question about the Arab countries and democracy. And Germany and their relation to Hitler. Alice A. Bailey did not leave out Islam because they were partly scheming with Hitler. Islam is not the same as fascism. Everyone knows that. Alice A. Bailey wrote books long before the Second World War began. And the Jews were shipped to Israel during the war and talked more about than Islam in Alice A. Bailey's books.
It is interesting to consider what is the best system to use. A Democracy with the Christians ruling it secretly (perhaps with economic cultural imperialism) in the background or a peaceful Caliphate with the Priests deciding more directly?
Most countries in the United Nations General Assembly are Christians. And the United Nations Security Counsil is still a non-democratic body even if they have non-permanent members rotating aroud their own axis. With 4 out of its 5 permanent members being Christian countries, there is bound to be problems on this planet. Well that is my view. The theosophical teachings are in direct opposition to the teachings of the Catholic Church and its doctrines, which are governed by the Jesuits.
5. Alice A. Bailey and the Freemasons
John wrote:
>>"As the U.N. was very young in 1949 I don't assign the same significance to Alice A. Bailey as you prefer. She passed in the same year."<<
No. But Alice A. Bailey groups world wide are about ten times as many and ten times the number than all other theosophical groups put together. And they are through their Lucis Trust in close communication with the United Nations body. They meddle with politics. The theosophical teachings as given by H. P. Blavatsky was and is not doing that, because of compassion. Alice A. Bailey and her later followers have as far as I know never clearly explained why there was a need to change the theosophical activities so they became more directly involved with politics.
Try reading the following link although I recommend reading between the Freemason lines. Not all of the content is true or honest:
An excerpt:
"Luci's Trust is sponsored by among others Robert McNamara, former minister of Defence in the USA, president of the World Bank, member of the Rockefeller Foundation, and Thomas Watson (IBM, former ambassador in Moscow). Luci's Trust sponsors among others the following organizations: UN, Greenpeace Int., Greenpeace USA, Amnesty Int. and UNICEF.
The United Nations has long been one of the foremost world harbingers for the "New Spirituality" and the gathering "New World Order" based on ancient occult and freemasonic principles. Seven years after the birth of the UN, a book was published by the theosophist and founder of the Lucis Trust, Alice Bailey, claiming that "Evidence of the growth of the human intellect along the needed receptive lines [for the preparation of the New Age] can be seen in the "planning" of various nations and in the efforts of the United Nations to formulate a world plan... From the very start of this unfoldment, three occult factors have governed the development of all these plans". [Alice B. Bailey, Discipleship in the New Age (Lucis Press, 1955), Vol. II, p.35.] "
http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/lucistrust.html
So I find its influence significant. Especially when there is a growing tension between the Arab countries and various western countries. And also because the Catholic Pope want to write Christianity and its values into the European Unions Treaty. And a great number of leading politicians in the EU are supporting that view.
- - - - - - -
What you may take to be attractive, or even spread out by us
to be attractive to you, may well not be intended in this manner at
all. That which attracts you, or others, about us may be that
which is laid down by us as a tool which enables us to regard
you (or others) as unsuitable. (Idries Shah)
M. Sufilight
----- Original Message -----
From: Augoeides-222@comcast.net
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Alice A. Bailey and The United Nations - The Word made FLESH!
Morten,
Thanks for your comments. I, being almost twice your age recall most of the history, Mao Tse Tung's Long March defeated the KMT and general Chang Kai Shek who fled to the island of Formosa for refuge. "Possession is 9/10ths of the Law" is an old aphorism and China was the victor. Today the United Nations recognizes only one China, the Mainland China with Taiwan integral to it with conditions.One of the curious things about Formosa/Taiwan is that all the ancient Maps of the Chinese Dynasty's don't show possession of the Island by any of them. it seemed to have maintained a Independent Automony of the mainland with a recognized aboriginal population of "Pirates" established many centuries back. The claim of Formosa being integral to China mainland proper seems to have begun with Mao Tse Sung. "Tai-wan" and "Tai-pei" are both two names of the three named parts of Formosa.
Much of the post war history is distinctly tainted by Communist Expansionism accompanied by the counter force of the Free West to prevent them from gobbling all in their path of expansion. It was more Chinese in Korea than Russians, the Russians flew Mig.'s against South Korea and the American and Allied forces. They had routed the No. Koreans back to the Demarcation line and the Yalu river but then China sent 5 Army's across the border overwhelming both the So. Korean and allied forces and pushing them back almost into the South China Sea.It was McArthurs brilliant strategems that saved the day. America lost over 53,000 dead and many more wounded defending the Free South Korea which survives to this day as a stellar free nation. The "Brainwashing" issue was about the No. Korean and Chinese Communist atrocious techniques carried out on American, Aussy, New Zealand, Canadian POW's. In modern China today it is called Reindoctrination or Reeducation. The West never said "We are n
ot Jesuits" to anyone to my memory, it is your own aphorism.
China is part of the equation in world economics but when the shoe drops they are Totalitarian Authoritative Communists to the core above all else and they are strongly still pursuing expansionism having obtained the roof of the world Tibet, parts of India, the Paracel islands, th Sprately Islands, and other localities beyond every previous Chinese dynasty's prior borders. There is a great deal more that could be said but not here.
Maybe Alice A. Baileys lack of personal mention was she was possibly ignorant of it. It also could have been that in her day and time the world was much different than the way we perceive it now. Recall that all the Arab Nations gloried as allies of Hitler's Third Reich. Turkey is about the only Islamic Nation that examples real Democracy thanks to modern Turkeys Attaturk.
You will notice that in addition to the 5 permanent Security Council members there are also 10 Non-Permanent Security Council Members that also compose the Full Security Council. Those 10 members rotate the 1 year office among the rest of the U. N. members so all have participation in rotating order.
In the UN there are the 162 Non-aligned Nations so-called which include in it's number the Arab League Nations they are the greatest number voting in the General Assembly.
As the U.N. was very young in 1949 I don't assign the same significance to Alice A. Bailey as you prefer. She passed in the same year.
The United States Tested the Bomb earlier the Russia no thanks to the Rosenberg's.
Once I mentioned the ancient Caannanite/Phoenician Religion here some time back. The Deity was named "El". El had two sons Baal and Yamm. Baal was the "Good" Son who had no place ( no Temple ) to lay his head. Yamm was the bad son. Judaism later had also the motif of Able and Cain sons of the Patriarch and, in similar motif both Islam and Christianity as found are dependent upon Judaism in the same way Judaism if dependent upon the Caananite/Phoenician for certain important origins. Moses threw down the Tablets when he saw they had reverted to the worship of "Baal - the Son of El" characterized as the "Golden Calf", Gold is the highest spiritual color and the Calf is the yet unmatured Bull. In genesis the very first name of deity is "El."
Regards,
John
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@stofanet.dk>
My views are:
Thanks John.
It might also be well to know about the difference between the "Republic of China" and "People's Republic of China". And the fact that the People's Republic of China overtook the permanent seat from Republic of China in the United Nations Security Counsil as late as 1971-1972.
So at Alice A. Bailey's time it was the "Republic of China", who had the permanent seat in United Nations Security Counsil. And it was at that time (the time of Alice A. Bailey writing 1945-1949) a very weak country influenced by foreign countries influences. And we remember that Alice A. Bailey called the communist Soviet a totalitarian state (Try for instance "The Externalisation of the Hierarchy" by Alice A. Bailey).
At the same time one aught to take the role into account of the last part of the Second World War - the war between North and South Korea, who continued fighting even after peace were drawn between Japan and the Allied Forces. The Soviet and USA was heavily involved on both sides. Remember the Soviet first tested its nuclear bomb in august 1949. And Alice A. Bailey disliked the Soviet rule. Other did the same if I might say so.
And later the Korean war with the Brainwashing issue moved into the picture. The West saying: We are not the Jesuits.
Today communist China almost rule world economics. The aim of USA and friends seems to be The Middle East, and they need China to put pressure on Iran etc. And the Middle East was not mentioned by Alice A. Bailey above the level superficial. She only used ten lines on that major religion called Islam in her many pages. And we wonder why? Islam was by her turned into a hybrid offshoot of Christianity with a tinge of Judaism - and not a real Root Religion like Christianity.
Republic of China
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China
People's Republic of China
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s_Republic_of_China
United Nations Security Counsil
"For a view of the council layout click this link http://www.undispatch.com/UN%20Security%20Council%20-%20BBC.gif Until 2000 Israel was the only United Nations member country not a member of any regional group and so could not be elected to the Security Council or become involved in many consultative UN bodies. Israel would normally fall within the Asia group but many Arab states blocked Israel's inclusion in this group. In 2000 Israel was granted temporary membership in the Western European and Others Group (WEOG) and this was extended indefinitely in 2004. Israel is limited in the activities that it can undertake as part of WEOG.[7]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Security_Council
North Korea
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/North_Korea
- - - - - - -
The bitter truth is that before man can know his own inadequacy, or the competence of another
man or institution, he must first learn something which will enable him to perceive both. Note well
that his perception itself is a product of right study; not of instinct or emotional attraction to the
individual, nor yet of desiring to 'go it alone'. This is 'Learning How To Learn.' (Idries Shah)
M. Sufilight
----- Original Message -----
From: Augoeides-222@comcast.net
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 4:03 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Alice A. Bailey and The United Nations - The Word made FLESH!
Morten and all,
Here are a few links that may be helpful in regards to the contnets of this post:
Alice A. Bailey
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Bailey<<<
Charter of the United Nations
>>>http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/<<<
Members of the United Nations Security Council
>>>http://www.un.org/sc/members.asp<<<<
U. N. Police Roles
>>>http://www.unddr.org/iddrs/04/50.php<<<
U. N. Peacekeeping Missions List
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_peacekeeping_missions<<<
United Natiuons -Wikipedia
>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations<<<
Regards,
John
-------------- Original message --------------
From: "Morten Nymann Olesen" <global-theosophy@stofanet.dk>
To all readers
My views are:
Alice A. Bailey and The United Nations.
A few thoughts on what have happened since the illegal war in Iraq.
And how Alice A. Bailey's teaching are showing to be problematic.
First I will throw a quote, which are important to the following content of this e-mail.
H. P. Blavatsky wrote a letter to W. Q. Judge:
"I am confident that, when the real nature of Theosophy is understood, the prejudice against it, now so unfortunately prevalent, will die out. Theosophists are of necessity the friends of all movements in the world, whether intellectual or simply practical, for the amelioration of the condition of mankind. We are the friends of all those who fight against drunkenness, against cruelty to animals, against injustice to women, against corruption in society or in government, although we do not meddle in politics. "
http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/hpb-am/hpb-am1.htm
(Letter I - 1888 - Second Annual Convention - April 22-23 - American Section of the Theosophical Society )
- - - - - - -
Alice A. Bailey and The United Nations.
A few thoughts on what have happened since the illegal war in Iraq.
We all know that the international body The United Nations was created in 1945 just after the Second World War. We also know, that it was created to secure the peace in the world for the benefit of the future of mankind for all nations. Please remember: All nations!
The book named "The Externalization of the Hierarchy" by Alice A. Bailey is central in showing how Alice A. Bailey related to the then newborn international organisation called The United Nations. But using her teachings might very well prove to be very bad to do and might play all the cards into the hands of the Jesuits.
Alice A. Bailey thinks that the United Nations can lead humanity towards liberation.
Even when the United Nations Security Counsil are a non-democratic body with only 5 permanent member countries working for peace! With 4 of them having Christian backgrounds. This kind of corrupt political activity will have to stop in the New World, which awaits humanity.
In the below I will suggest that you have Alice A. Bailey's use of the word "God" in mind.
- - - - - - -
1. Try to compare these quotes from Alice A. Bailey with H. P. Blavatsky's teachings
- - - - - - -
Alice A. Bailey thinks in the below that the United Nations can lead humanity towards liberation. Even when the United Nations Security Counsil are a non-democratic body working for peace! This kind of corrupt political activity will have to stop in the New World, which awaits humanity.
Alice A. Bailey wrote:
"Esoterically speaking, the work of the Hierarchy is to focus the divine will-to-good as it affects humanity. The work of spiritually minded men is to evoke that will-to-good on earth through as full an expression as possible of goodwill. It is the goodwill of the masses, focused everywhere through the United Nations who are fighting for the liberation of mankind and through the New Group of World Servers, which is sufficient to invoke the will-to-good and only this is adequate. This is an important statement and one on which I would ask you to ponder."
(The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey, page 396)
AAB thinks in the below that the United Nations Security Counsil can lead humanity towards liberation. But that is a false aim today, when we only have 5 permanent member countries of The United Nations Security Counsil. With 4 of them having Christian backgrounds.
Alice A. Bailey wrote:
"I would ask all of you, therefore, to have an open mind, to redouble your belief in the fact of the spiritual realities, to have faith in the will-to-good of the divine purpose and to love your fellowmen; and - upon the plane of practical affairs and living - to do two things: Carry forward your due share in this physical plane war, aiding the armed forces of the United Nations to wage war to a successful finish, knowing that there are spiritual realities for which it is worth dying if need be, and that war on evil can be waged without hate and with right purpose; secondly, plan at the same time for those practical measures which, after the war is over, will aid the period of reconstruction and help rehabilitate humanity, and lead to a saner, better, truer way of living."
Alice A. Bailey also wrote:
"There is, however, a plus, a something else, which will swing the tide of victory on to the side of the United Nations. This will come through the effort to understand and express the quality of spiritual Will; it will be the manifestation of that energy which makes the first divine aspect of Will or Power what it is; it is that which is the distinctive feature of the Shamballa force; it is that peculiar and distinctive quality of divinity which is so different that even Christ Himself was unable to express it with facility and understanding."
(The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey, page 343)
- - - - - - -
2. Try to compare these quotes from H. P. Blavatsky and Alice A. Bailey
- - - - - - -
H.P. Blavatsky wrote in December 1887:
In CARNALIZING the central figure of the New Testament, in imposing
the dogma of the Word MADE FLESH, the Latin Church sets up a doctrine
diametrically opposed to the tenets of Buddhist and Hindu Esotericism
and the Greek Gnosis. Therefore, there will always be an abyss
between the East and the West, as long as neither of these dogmas
yields. Almost 2,000 years of bloody persecution against HERETICS
and INFIDELS by the Church looms before the Oriental nations to
prevent them from renouncing their philosophic doctrines in favor of
that which degrades the CHRISTOS principle. [372-373]
...the Christians, by localizing and isolating this great Principle,
and denying it to any other man except Jesus of Nazareth (or the
Nazar), CARNALIZE the Christos of the Gnostics; that alone prevents
them having any point in common with the disciples of the Archaic
Wisdom. . . . [374]
. . . true Theosophists will never accept ...a Christ made
Flesh. . . .[390]
A "God walking on Earth" is pictured entirely different by Alice A. Bailey in her book "Light of the Soul" (The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali - 1927, with commentary by Alice A. Bailey - http://nimrodgroup.org/AAB ) page 13:
"There are three books which should be in the hands of every student, the Bhagavad Gita, the New Testament, and the Yoga Sutras, for in these three is contained a complete picture of the soul and its unfoldment." ..."In the New Testament there is depicted for us the life of a Son of God in full manifestation, wherein, freed from every veil, the soul in its true nature walks the earth. It becomes apparent to us, as we study the life of Christ, what it means to develop the powers of the soul, to attain liberation, and become, in full glory, a God walking on earth."
Here Alice A. Bailey is make the Word into FLESH. And this is not acceptable theosophical teaching!
- - - - - - -
H. P. Blavatsky wrote about the plot of the Jesuits
". . . . . It would be well perhaps, if the Jesuits contented themselves with making dupes of Freemasons and opposing the Theosophists and Occultists using for it the Protestant clergy as "cat's paw." But their plottings have a much wider scope, and embrace a minuteness of detail and care of which the world in general has no idea. Everything is done by them to bring the mass of mankind again to the state of passive ignorance which they well know is the only one which can help them to the consummation of their purpose of Universal Despotism."
(from THE LETTERS OF H. P. BLAVATSKY to A. P. SINNETT and OTHER MISCELLANEOUS LETTERS TRANSCRIBED, COMPILED, AND WITH AN INTRODUCTION By A. T. BARKER. First Published 1925)
M. Sufilight
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
