Theos-Talk Archives (July 2008 Message tt00304)

Well that is your view.
I have another view. Our views of course depend on your level of knowledge.

It is also known, that HPB changed the content of the SD until the last second before it was printed. Who was Keightly actually and who gave him and others the thought to rearrange it all?

I am sure you never do that, but Please do not underestimate our Masters.

Are you saying that the Mahatma Letters to Hübbe Schleiden from 1886 are wrong, and Master Morya and Master K.H. was not behind the book after all?




M. Sufilight


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Konstantin Zaitzev 
  To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:07 PM
  Subject: Re: Theos-World Cheers ! Theosophical Society succeeded in attaining it's object


  --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Morten Nymann Olesen" 
  <global-theosophy@...> wrote:

  > About the Secret Doctrine.
  > I say No.
  > That is not a true statement.
  > The Secret Doctrine was definitly given from a higher source of 
  >> From: Drpsionic@... 
  >> it made the Secret Doctrine look simple by comparison.

  The complexity doesn't mean truth, so there's no any contradiction.
  S.D. comparatively lucid, the only problem with is that the collegues 
  made HPB to rearrange material, what made the composition somewhat 
  chaotic, while initially it was good enough.
  Her only mistake was that she listened to advices of more ignorant 
  people than she. It relates not to composition only but also to use of 
  some terms.



   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]