Theos-Talk Archives (June 2008 Message tt00216)

Please give me an example, what in your opinion is a contradiction on the list.

Frank


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Anand 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:53 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Hello China, Atheism does not work


http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/krishnamurti/TSL_Column.htm
There are some people who believe there are contradictions and there
are some who don't believe. It is a strange situation. 
I would like opinions of many people, a kind of survey.

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@...> wrote:
>
> Funny, any contradictions are in your mind alone.
> 
> I see no real contradiction between the statements on the list.
> 
> Both HPB and K would laugh.
> 
> Frank
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Anand 
> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 9:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Theos-World Hello China, Atheism does not work
> 
> 
> You can read this comparison. It shows how Blavatsky's Theosophy was
> uprooted by J. Krishnamurti.
> http://www.alpheus.org/html/articles/krishnamurti/TSL_Column.htm
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > Did he really?
> > 
> > I thought K did only reject false leaders, cant, hyprocracy and
> blind belief 
> > in dogmas/hearsay/dead letter.
> > 
> > Frank
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: Anand
> > To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 7:38 PM
> > Subject: Re: Theos-World Hello China, Atheism does not work
> > 
> > 
> > .
> > >
> > >
> > > Why do you hold such an extreme prejudice to JK? What he meant by
> > > "authorities" is certainly of psychological and spiritual rather
> than of
> > > physical and technical and governmental, etc. .
> > 
> > I think Krishnamurti's indiscriminate rejection of psychological,
> > spiritual and religious authorities is ridiculously wrong. .
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>



 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]