Theos-Talk Archives (June 2008 Message tt00035)

Frank,
    My personal view is that the Canon of the O.T. is well established, known and accepted by reputable Theologians everywhere. I think the idea the the O.T. was Germanic is pure fiction and bizarre wild invention that no one with sanity would accept or believe. Just because there was a history of Jewish Communities and Temples for centuries in Europe is no basis to imply such a thing. The Jews always kept the known to them the Canon of their Religion intact by various means and that includes the excluded parts of the Western O.T. like the Book of Jubilee, and Ester along with the Torah, Mischna and other compendiums they have had for all these centuries. There are evidences of texts from the 1st century in Hebrew of the Kaballa. I don't accept that only three copies of the O.T. survived unless some how you confuse the WWII Nazi extermination and genecide of millions including the Jews along with the  willful destruction of all the Jewish Temples. and Religious Holdings as the reas
on for only three copies surviving in Germany.
   
  I can find agreement that Blavatsky said the literal text has inner communications to render to those who have the knowledge to make it unveil to them, and that blinds or masks were utilized but that refers to the text in Hebrew itself, the Mother of the Canon. The O.T. didn't begin with Gutenberg, sorry.

You might attempt to find a copy of the "Bahir" it is a work attributed to Rab bi Nehumia ben haKana Master of the 1st Century esoteric school.

The Bahir Illumination
Publisher: Samuel Weiser,  Inc.
1st Paper Edition, 1979
ISBN # 0-87728-618-3
Printed in the USA by Edwards Brothers, Inc
>From the Estate of Aryeh Kaplan  


Regards,
John
   
-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@online.de> 
John,
HPB states that we don't know the true Old Testament (as also with the NT), 
as from the OT only three copies have survived up to date and that the OT we 
know of, has nothing to do with the real one.
There is reason to believe that it is connected with Old High German which 
may have been a sister adept language of Sans krit (Holy writ).

HPB also states that the dead letter or first levels text of OT and NT is 
but a blind or a mask and that the real text is on other levels.

Recent scientific research of Prof. Christian Lindtner confirms HPB. 
Lindtner is persecuted for his results.
FRank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Augoeides-222@comcast.net
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: Theos-World Re: Failure of Krishnamurti on the path of 
occultism

Frank,
Hi, well people have many idea's about this identity that occupies history. 
As I previously posted "El" had two Sons Baal and Yamm. El was the deity of 
the Caananite/Phoenician Civilization prior to the arrival of the Ghebers of 
Hebron. In Genesis El is the first identative name placed before the minds 
of people. It was later that the first form "Yah" appeared, in time further 
permutations yielded Yaweh. The mystical Yod He Vav He (26) came much later 
in the time line from which the later modern Jehova came into appearance and 
finished the evolution to our present time. "Yah" was originally a 
"Door-sill Fetish" used to prevent the entry into the house of undesirable 
entity's and demons and was usually installed by a paid exorcist. Religions 
don't appear in finished, polished completion, they had beginning-change-end 
across centuries of time and drama.

I suggested the works :
"The Assembly of the Gods- The Divine Council in Caananite and Early Hebrew 
Literature " Author: E. Theodore Mullen Jr.
Harvard Semitic Monographs 24
1980 Dist. by Scholars Press
ISSN #0073- 0637

(From Brown University
Vestiges of the Spirit-History of Man by Samuel F. Dunlap , 1858
Sod - The Son of Man by Samuel F. Dunlap, and his other works.
Dunlap engaged in intensive Philology and Etymology in his works.

Regards,
John

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@online.de>
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:

> Word God does not exist in original Hebrew Old Testament. Yahweh was
> the word which was used in Hebrew Old Testament.
> English translation of Yahweh is God.

Yahweh does not exist in the Hebrew OT.
It has YHVH.
English translation of YHVH is Yahve, not God, because he is not God.
Frank

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]