Theos-Talk Archives (May 2008 Message tt00383)

N> You write, "And the difference of level of 
N> spiritual impact of these two are quite obviously 
N> telling me, that H. P. Blavatsky was operating on 
N> a much higher level than J. Krishnamurti."
 
N> Once again you seem to be professing the powers 
N> of an adept. To judge someone's level of spiritual 

One shouldn't be an adept to make such conclusions.
Blavatsky performed miracles, Krishnamurti not. So she seems to have 
more advantages from the purely worldly point of view.
Some may say: it is not proved, she might be a humbug. Then it would 
be logical to dismiss her totally and follow Krishnamurti only. But 
why to try to follow them both? They are in many respects 
incompatible.

Another reason why he "was operating on a much higher level". Without 
her no Indian teacher: nor Vivekananda, neither Krishnamurti could be 
popular outside India.