Theos-Talk Archives (March 2008 Message tt00203)

You are right on John, in this thread at least.

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Augoeides-222@... wrote:
>
> Frank,
>    Sorry, but it appears to me that the citation you point to are 
the wrods of Brois and not H.P.B., it is only his personal 
theeosophical opinion as I perceive it. Which of course he is 
perfectly entitled to have. However this forum more and more reminds 
of a apck of ostriches with their heads up their asses and completely 
oblivious to the real world.
> Regards,
> John
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@...> 
> As a moon landing protestant I state her argument 7 for 
consideration of 
> Blavatsky students:
> 
> 7. "While a transfer of human beings from earth to moon can hardly 
be 
> considered as a trip to "another" planet, it nevertheless is a very 
> dangerous undertaking, mainly from the standpoint of unfamiliar 
magnetism, 
> altered psycho-physical surrounding, and absence of those dynamic 
forces 
> which form the very life-blood of the globe we live on today. It is 
to be 
> hoped that science will eventually take cognizance of these 
factors."
> 
> - Boris de Zirkoff, in: Theosophia vol. xxv, No. 3 (117), Winter 
1968-1969, 
> pp. 3-4
> 
http://www.teozofija.info/Theosophia/Theosophia_Vol25_No3.htm#WorldsTr
ade
> 
> ----------------------------------
> 
> Contrast alone can enable us to appreciate things at their right 
value; and 
> unless a judge compares notes and hears both sides he can hardly 
come to a 
> correct decision.... For one man to demand from another that he 
shall 
> believe like himself, whether in a question of religion or science 
is 
> supremely unjust and despotic.... Mental slavery is the worst of 
all 
> slaveries. It is a state which, as brutal force has no real power, 
always 
> denotes either an abject cowardice or a great intellectual 
weakness."
> 
> - Helena P. Blavatsky, The Theosophist, July 1881, p. 218; 
reprinted in: 
> Blavatsky: Collected Writings, Vol. III, p. 225
> 
http://www.tonh.net/theosofie/hpb_cw_online/articles/v3/y1881_062.htm
> 
> JFK warns us about a ruthless conspiracy:
> 
> "For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless 
conspiracy 
> that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of 
> influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion 
instead of 
> elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by 
night 
> instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast 
human 
> and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly 
efficient 
> machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, 
> scientific and political operations. Its preparations are 
concealed, not 
> published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters 
are 
> silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is 
printed, no 
> secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-
time 
> discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match."
> 
> - President John F. Kennedy, speech at Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, New 
York City, 
> April 27, 1961.
> 
> http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=zkryNyxlubY&feature=related
> 
> http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=DxnpujfanUM&feature=related
> 
> http://de.youtube.com/watch?v=g-jHmhNJJys&feature=related
> 
> "The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little 
longer. 
> [The New World Order] cannot happen without U.S. participation, as 
we are 
> the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New 
World Order, 
> and it will force the United States to change it's perceptions."
> - Henry Kissenger, World Affairs Council Press Conference, Regent 
Beverly 
> Wilshire Hotel , April 19th 1994
> 
> http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Henry_Kissinger/
> 
> Frank 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>