Theos-Talk Archives (November 2007 Message tt00064)

With HPB one has to discriminate three things:

1. The ancient wisdom - Theosophy
2. It's imperfect vehicle - Theosophical Society/Movement
3. Theosophists

Furthermore there are also merely members of a theosophical group.

In this discrimination lies your answer.

The manasa-putras cannot modify your ego.
It's up to you and only to you to grow.
If you don't want to go higher, no manasa-putra and no Jesus on the cross 
can do it for you.

Icke seems to have true information from ancient wisdom with misinformation 
combined.
But I fear the reptiles are really among us.
Frank


----- Original Message ----- 
From: opetha
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 12:36 AM
Subject: Theos-World Re: Blavatsky-fundamentalists partying at Beverly Hills


Hello be it,

I like hearing the term "Blavatski fundementalist", is it with pride
and acceptance you use this phrase (as a theosophist? because I have
always felt that the theosophical movement was based on rhetoric and
not experience (i.e. meditation).

I mentioned something like this on the anthrospophy site and got a
death threat from a coven girl....is Blavatski the new Mohammed and
Secret Doctrine the new Q'uran?

But to change the subject a little bit...theosophy teaches that this
fourth manvantara is remarked by spiritual powers modifying man's EGO
(mind/manas). This is interesting if we equate the facts of modern
society, its informational overload---including occult as information---
and how the personality of the modernite justifies itself with EGO-
totems. Is it safe to say that the rise in consciousness that we are
seeing, not with yogi's and magicians, but with TV personalities and
youngsters extraverted arrogance, and the overcoming of romance in film
and cinema with plastic ruthlessness--is this the work of the
predominant architects? work that has detroyed soul in music and cinema?

If it is then do you see the pattern in which modern "esotericists"
have sided *against* Christianity, for not providing for the EGO-mind
as Thelema, theosophy etc, do? here is the battle of soul versus spirit.

I suppose the Manasa-Pitris have been modifying man's EGO-mind for a
much longer period than this relatively recent fall of Christianity and
rise in modernity, so if the rise in informational mind is the work of
natural forces then we can only guess why it is now that they've made
the ruthless boost.

This reminds one of the "Pleadian Agenda" of the Mayan-new agers and
David Ike's reptile paranoia (or even Rael's alien creators). It's a
question of how the modifiers relate to these similar ideas and what
faction after all is the benefactor and which the enslaver, etc. etc.

Godot.

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Anand" <AnandGholap@...> wrote:
>
> Theo-talk list completed it's seven years a month back. In all these
> seven years lowest number of messages in a month were in October 2007.
> In this month, it received just 80 posts. What does this indicate ?
> Does this mean that interest in Theos-talk is reducing ? Does this
> mean members think time can be used in better way than talking at
> Theos-talk ? According to sources, Blavatsky-fundamentalists were
> partying at Beverly Hills.
> Anand
>