Theos-Talk Archives (July 2007 Message tt00200)

Pablo,
I would be glad to read the Purucker text you have examined.
Where does he write about Kumaras etc. in contradiction to HPB?
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Pablo Sender
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:26 AM
Subject: Re: Theos-World John Algeo on Modern Theosophy


In every book GdeP talk about the Hierarchies he said that. I doubt
you've never read it. I can give the references if you want. The same
as HPB's... it is a very basic teaching...
All send the references tomorrow

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Reitemeyer" <dzyan@...> wrote:
>
> Pablo writes:
> Let's go to the root of the thing. It is Ok to me if you support GdeP
> teachings. That's your right. I cannot do it because when studying
> obscure matters in the SD and going to his books for some light, I
> never found an answer, only discrepancies (from my point of view).
> Two small examples, besides that of the 12 globes:
> 1 - He says Kumaras, Manasaputras and Agnisvattas are the same
> entities: before, during and after having passed through the human
> stage. A nice idea, but it doesn't fit with HPB's in several ways.
> One of them: if a Kumara is a spiritually passive entity before
> passing through the human experience, Why is Sanat Kumara & Co. (very
> evolved Beings) called that way, and not Sanat Agnisvatta, for
> example?
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Pablo, could you please specify oyur sources?
> To which text of GdeP and HPB do you refer exactly?
> Frank
>