Theos-Talk Archives (July 2007 Message tt00124)

1. Theosophical Society and it's main leaders like Blavatsky, Besant
and Leadbeater have always wrote on the importance of the Masters and
path of occultism. According to Krishnamurti Masters are not necessary
and path of occultism does not exist.
2. According to Blavatsky-Besant-Leadbeater, study of books on
Theosophy and scriptures are important for spiritual development,
whereas according to Krishnamurti books corrupt minds of people.
3. According to Theosophy there is gradual evolution of consciousness
and state of self-realization comes after evolution for long time,
whereas according to Krishnamurti there is no evolution, there is only
"sudden, radical, immediate change"
4. According to Blavatsky-Besant-Leadbeater, man should consider
himself as reincarnating soul and consider future effects of his
present actions, whereas there is no place for reincarnation in
Krishnamurti's speeches. According to him people should not think
about future.

As Krishnamurti's statements are exactly opposite of
Blavatsky-Besant-Leadbeater, one of the two teachings is wrong. 
So who is deluded, Blavatsky-Besant-Leadbeater or Krishnamurti ?
 Anand Gholap