Theos-Talk Archives (July 2007 Message tt00049)

The article is insofar interesting as it shows that a PTS must have not much knowledge of Theosophy.

One example of Burnier's confused thinking:

>Some people hold Theosophy is what Blavatsky wrote and nothing else [...] Anything other than Blavatsky is not Theosophy, or should be called pseudo-Theosophy.

Mmmh. 
Did Blavatsky or HPB say that anything other which comes not from her is not Theosophy? 
Did she define pseudo-Theosophy?
Did she differ between pukka Theosophy and pseudo-Theosophy?
Did she differ between Theosophists and Theosophers?
Did she proclaim arbitrarity?
Did she proclaim marxist indifference and egalitarianism?
Would she return today to Adyar?

And finally:
Did she announce her successor?
Take a look to slide 38 and see what HPB:. reveals 
in her last photograph to those whose eyes are opened:
http://www.theosophycanada.com/pics/slide38.jpg

4 messengers of the Masters will appear in succession.
The 2nd one has to do with the magazine in the right hand which bears the occult ring.
They represent the white side, the Arhat Brotherhood of Trans-Himalaya.

Others may find more information in this picture puzzle.
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: M K Ramadoss 
To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com ; theos-L@yahoogroups.com ; K-and-C@yahoogroups.com ; listening-l@zrz.tu-berlin.de 
Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 2:20 PM
Subject: Theos-World Krishnamurti,Theosophy, Theosophical Society - Views of Radha Burnier


In a article published in The Theosophist, Aug 2005, I find the most
definitive statement by Radha Burnier about K, TS, Masters etc. I do not
know how I missed it. However, I found it on-line and here is the link.

Some may find it very interesting.

mkr

www.austheos.org.au/topics/RB-TS-and-K.htm

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]