Theos-Talk Archives (June 2007 Message tt00153)

I asked for a clarification on an important matter and you
give me a Commedy Central type "joke".  Interesting.

OBTW, Chuck is funnier.  :)

I guess you don't want to explain what you actually
meant by those two statements.   

Daniel
http://hpb.cc


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "proto37" <proto37@...> wrote:
>
>   Jeez, I wonder why Dan C. keeps reminding me of the scarecrow in
> "Wizard of OZ" who sings.... "Oh but... If I only had a brain!'  (or
> was that "a heart"?
> 
>              - jake j.
> 
> 
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "danielhcaldwell"
> <danielhcaldwell@> wrote:
> >
> > Jake,
> > 
> > You now write:
> > 
> > "There isn't any dispute about ES Instruction IV....."
> > 
> > But if this is true, then why did you originally write the 
following:
> > 
> > "WHY DID DE ZIRKOFF CAST DOUBT ON THE VERACITY OF SOME THINGS IN 
ES 
> > IV & V?"
> > 
> > Are you now saying that de Zirkoff did not cast doubt on the 
veracity 
> > of some things in ES IV?
> > 
> > Or are you saying that regardless of de Zirkoff's assessment, you 
are 
> > now of the opinion that "there isn't any dispute about ES 
Instruction 
> > IV"?
> > 
> > Or....
> > 
> > I am unclear about what you are really trying to convey in these 
two 
> > statements of yours.
> > 
> > Hoping for a clarification.
> > 
> > dc
> >
>