Theos-Talk Archives (June 2007 Message tt00143)

Jake,

You now write:

"There isn't any dispute about ES Instruction IV....."

But if this is true, then why did you originally write the following:

"WHY DID DE ZIRKOFF CAST DOUBT ON THE VERACITY OF SOME THINGS IN ES 
IV & V?"

Are you now saying that de Zirkoff did not cast doubt on the veracity 
of some things in ES IV?

Or are you saying that regardless of de Zirkoff's assessment, you are 
now of the opinion that "there isn't any dispute about ES Instruction 
IV"?

Or....

I am unclear about what you are really trying to convey in these two 
statements of yours.

Hoping for a clarification.

dc