Theos-Talk Archives (February 2007 Message tt00179)

Hawass says that only 30 per cent of the monuments etc have been found and "who knows what lies under the sand".  Also I believe that camels would have been more suited to the climate than horses.
   
  Cass

Drpsionic@aol.com wrote:
          
In a message dated 2/12/2007 4:55:12 PM Central Standard Time, 
silva_cass@yahoo.com writes:

This was the hard evidence. It is always "hard" until something new is 
discovered and it becomes "soft" or "something to build on" (excusing the pun!)

N Rays were never hard evidence. Neither was Od. Hard evidence is physical 
evidence and the math is not the the territory.

Worker's villages are hard evidence as is the lack of horse skeletons.

Chuck the Heretic

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



         

 
---------------------------------
Don't get soaked.  Take a quick peak at the forecast 
 with theYahoo! Search weather shortcut.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]