Theos-Talk Archives (February 2007 Message tt00175)

Chuck
  This was the hard evidence. It is always "hard" until something new is discovered and it becomes "soft" or "something to build on" (excusing the pun!)
   
  Cass

Drpsionic@aol.com wrote:
          
In a message dated 2/12/2007 3:08:15 PM Central Standard Time, 
th.paijmans@wxs.nl writes:

Well, let us trace that lineage a bit further, shall we? Articles on the 
N rays (Blondot), before that it was the od (Reichenbach) and the ether 
(until the infamous Michelson-Morley experiment) - and before that it 
was against the existence of meteorites because stones could not 
possibly fall from the skies.

All true and that is what comes from lack of hard evidence. 

Chuck the Heretic

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



         

 	 
---------------------------------
Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.  

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]