5 of 7 - Inner Self
Jan 16, 2007 09:07 AM
by Mark Jaqua
5 of 7 - Inner Self
V. CHILDHOOD
Starting as a child you seek guidance
outside yourself because you know no better
and you don't have the brain to even imagine
being a source of your own guidance.
Everyone wants to belong, and when you are
a child you want to belong to all of the idiots
who don't think, which is the whole crux of the
problem. Ultimately your own system is the
guidance you're seeking and is perfectly
attuned to your circumstance.
In the short of it, without knowing it, a child
thinks that its parents are god. Only later
does the brain develop to the point where the
child can have a concept of god, beyond the
concept of parents. You must constantly
keep this in mind when dealing with young
children, because if you are harsh or strong
with them, they think "god" is attacking them.
They think god is all-knowing. They think
god's knowledge is absolute and infallible.
So if god is attacking them, they must be evil.
The reason you have to be careful with them
is because they can fall into thinking they are
evil and never know what happened.
This carries into adulthood and when
people throw god out the window. It is
because they cannot stand the pressure of
feeling worthless, useless, evil, and they have
to throw away the thing that is making them
feel that way. When one has the concept of
an all-powerful god, and one sees people
who are castingyou upon youself, and
making you feel inferior, guilty, worthless,
useless, evil, you have to throw away the
concept as worthless. You are going to try
and maintain your own sense of worth. You
get to the point of not being able to tolerate
the thought of not seeing an end to it all. The
"devil" exists because of frustration. The real
black forces of this earth are the pent-up
forces of frustration. 'The desire to be
positive forced to be negative. It's a half-truth
based on ignorance, and a half-truth can be
more dangerous than ignorance.
We are born with fantasies. The child
believes his parents are god, and they are
exactly equal to the job. The first time he
suffers any discomfort, he can't make any
sense of it. It is in complete violation to the
way his mind works. The reason they give
you the idea of "god on high" is because
when you were a child you lived in a land of
giants. One of the most important things you
can do with your children is to get down on
the floor and play with them. When you are a
child, you have to get someone to do
everything for you because you aren't big
enough. The child is constantly persued by
the questions: Am I doing all right?; Am I
holding my end up? When you hold your end
up as an adult, you don't question it, you
know it. There's something radically wrong
there. I can remember these things very
clearly. The mind of a young child is a gold
mine. If you want to see where the main
event is, just look.
The new born infant only has wriggling and
crying to signal that it wants something. The
infant's mind frame is one in which it knows
of nothing but itself. Everything is itself - the
room, the world, the people, and it is the
source of its own fulfillment. In the best
situation, the mother figure, whoever is taking
care of the child, has to be someone who
doesn't have an inner revulsion to
expressions of individuality. Most do and
cannot tolerate individuality, because it
reminds them of the fact that they were not
allowed individuality.
If the mother figure has a positive attitude
toward the child and with experience is
sensitive to the child's needs and wants and
provides them, then the child starts off life
with acquiring the attitude of achieving
success in what it wants. This attitude forms
the basis for the rest of life. It can form an
attitude of being the one in control, of getting
what it wants. That is the whole issue and it
starts at the very beginning.
This is not spoiling the child. You cannot
spoil a child. What people call spoiling a
child, is the parent forcing the child into the
desires of the parent and which are the ones
he's allowed to have. It is forcing the child to
put all his desires into a particular pattern the
parent decides upon. That's why the "spoiled
child" always has fits and tantrums. It is
because he is forced into a false self and is
not allowed to be his real self. You cannot
fulfill a false self. The spoiled child occurs
from coddling and creating desires that are
not real in the child. They are fantasies and
are only real in the parent's own mind. The
child is only allowed to want what they want it
to want. That's the whole problem in a
nutshell. The kid never gets what he wants,
but only what he was allowed to want. After
awhile he no longer knows what he wants,
and only frustration remains.
It all starts in the mind set of the person
tending the child. If they can't tolerate "joie
de vivre!", let go and let go, let her rip!, the
rage to live... If they can't tolerate it and
almost none of them can tolerate, then they
just put a pillow on the child's face, no matter
what it looks like, and that's the end of that.
Parents beat their children because it is
very well learned. They've spent their entire
life beating themselves. You can't really
separate between yourself and the child.
There's no real guilt or pain involved in it,
because in you inner mind you are chastising
yourself - for things, I might add, the child may
not have even done. You project some
failure of your own into the pattern. You never
see it objectively.
The reason we are so long in raising
children is that their brain has not developed
the ability to answer to themselves. You are
actually an effective part of their brain. You
have to do their thinking for them, because
they don't have the ability to do it themselves
but the need. It is a tremendous and terrible
task.
You have a child, and the child is sick and
you do not recognize the sickness, as was
the case with me. The child from that person
cannot experience release from the
sickness. The child hungers for the release
from its sickness without knowing that it is the
need for the other person's mind in its life, to
do what it can't do yet. The child without
exception is being denied the presence of
another person in them and they in the other.
Honorably to do so is the right thing for the
child. Honorably is the big word.
The child by design sees itself as others
see it. If the child is seen as good and well,
the child sees itself as good and well. Most
of us darn near had none of being seen as
good and well. The result is that most of us
carry an unnamed burden throughout our
lives. It generates the sense that there is
something wrong here. The question of there
being something wrong here is what ends up
being answered to.
The work of childhood is play. The minute
the play doesn't have that genuine sparkle
and vivacity, they are off the track. It has to
be an on-going and constant thing because
the child cannot stand the frustration.
Children keep dealing with something until it
is over. Many traumas that occur in
childhood aren't retained as psycholgical
difficulties, but resolved right as they happen.
Most serious things are post-pubescent.
It doesn't take much positve reinforcement
in the average child for them to reach the
point of feeling good about themselves. But
if one runs into a negative aura in the father
or mother, if the parent is the type of person
who is so upset that they can't want to give
the attention that is needed, they can't want to
and there's nothing they can do about it. The
child will spend its life looking for an
acceptance that even if it finds, won't fill them
up. I call this negative impression on the
child "imprinting." Imprinting is an over-riding
subconscious determining factor.
The thing about people who are really
divorced from themselves is that they
possess an almost psychic ability, being
careful by what I mean by psychic. They
know how to hurt. They are able through the
bond that exists between parents and
children, for instance, to be sensitive to when
an action on their part will hurt the most. They
will pick the moment when you are ripe and
hit you. It is uncanny.
An odd thing is that female to male
imprinting is seldom accomplished, but when
it is it is very obvious. The female needs the
constant presence and acceptance of a male
figure. The female, in my mind, is never
capable of self determination. It is always
through the male figure. It is because of their
dependent role, I think. I think it is chemical.
When I see a woman who is headstrong,
self-determined, independent, this is all
hostility in my mind. The difference between
arrogance and humility is hostility in anybody.
In women it is hostility over the fact that they
never felt wanted securely by their male
imprinters. It could be a father, an older
brother, an uncle. The odd thing about it is
that this state can transpire in a woman for
forty years, and then they find a man and it
can completely turn around, which is the
unusual thing about it. I've seen it happen
several times. Unlike men, they can turn
around. If men do not get a favorable imprint
by the time they are two years old, there's
nothing you can do about it. If a man doesn't
get favorably imprinted as a child, he ends up
constantly trying to control his environment.
They are motivated by a desire to "engineer"
in people. They want to be the pope.
If you haven't spent a minimum of fifty hours
thinking about the mother child relationship,
you aren't going to have a nickle's worth of
sense about what is really going on. You
can't understand psychology until you
understand the mother-child relationship.
You see yourself as others see you, period.
That is what the mother-child relationship is
all about. If you don't get treated right from
the start, you never get started. It doesn't
matterif you live to be a hundred, or what any
therapist can do. If it isn't done right in the
beginning, it's never done right. It starts with
the first minute of birth and probably before.
Ideally when the infant demonstrates that it
wants something to change in its
environment, someone is there who
understands what the child wants and sees
that the child gets it. Mostly at the beginning,
this is physical manipulation. Importantly the
person responsible to the child should be
someone who does not have a deep-seated
objection to independence, their own or
anybody else's. It's all there in the first six
months for most people. If the string of ego
reinforcement, ego encouragement, ego
building and ego support is broken at
anytime between then and thirty, you are still
in trouble. That's how precarious it is.
Nobody will make it through if it isn't - and
people talk of a "beneficent god!"
The child-like state is the state that every
human alive is trying to get to. When I was
about twelve, I came to the conclusion that
adults were insane. They were as rammy as
billy goats, and so is everyone I've ever met.
Until I meet an adult with the flowering feeling
and drive of a young child, I will know I've
never met a sane person.
There is a big difference between childish
and child-like. The general state of
consciousness of the child is a state that we
would label euphoric. the child avoids any
training that tries to burst his balloon. In our
education system, all so-called learning is
imposed upon the kids from without and they
hate it. If the desire to learn something
comes from within, the kid will devour
whatever it is.
School was totally devorced from my
questions. That's why I hated it. I had so
many unanswered questions that I was
hanging from the ceiling by my toenails. In
my last year of high school, I didn't go to five
classes. I'd come to school two classes late,
and then hang out in the hall and smoke a
pack of cigarettes. A Catholic Brother would
then come out and tell me I had another
million years of detention. I could pass the
tests, but couldn't stand sitting in some class
with some guy telling me how important an
apostrophe was in a sentence, while
meanwhile I'm feeling like my insides are
falling out. I had no one to talk to, so I had to
get my answers from the inside. I was an
excellent student until I got into this, and then I
didn't care if the place burned down. To me, I
had to totally understand everything I
sutudied. I didn't memorize. I had to follow
my own master. There was absolutely
nothing in this world I could permit to be more
important.
I escaped into my mind from a world I
couldn't stand. I forced myself to think. I
started out with a blank page and everyone
who comes up with something new does the
same thing. I learned to notice when
something important went by in my mind. I
stopped everything, even if it took hours, to
track it back down and follow it up. After a
year or so of this, I never missed anything. I
came to the conclusion that I had to find all
my answers from within, that I wasn't going to
get them from anyone else.
People were making me so miserable that I
had to learn what made their heads tick. I
had to do it with no fantasy involved and
strictly and clearly see what made them
operate. At the time I had never heard the
word "psychology." I had never heard of
Freud. When I fully understood people to my
own satisfaction, and still it brought about no
relief, it caused my inner death. I went to the
other side.
Sometimes analysts claim that people or
children imagine that they were abused and
that this is the source of their problems. No
one ever imagines they were abused. There
could be a family of sixteen kids with only one
that became a psychiatric patient. All the
psychiatrist would say is that it was genetic.
It wouldn't be genetic, he was the one that
was used. He was the one that got all of the
kicks. I can never be convinced that anyone
can imagine that they were abused. If it is a
hundred to one of people saying that he had
a good home and the like, it's not possible
that he wasn't abused.
------------------
____________________________________________________________________________________
Finding fabulous fares is fun.
Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains.
http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application