Theos-Talk Archives (January 2007 Message tt00219)

Not only has he lied but he has slandered Ernest Pelletier and Daniel Caldwell, all in the name of a good day's work.  I justified my responses to Carlos on the basis of defending the truth, as I see it.  A justification which I now see as a meaningless waste of time.  Carlos is about disruption, all in the name of saving HPB from slanderers, a false prophet who believes he is the true voice of theosophy.   

If anyone is interested in discussing the articles in the collected writings I would be happy to share in the study.

Cass

danielhcaldwell <danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com> wrote:                                  First part of today, Mr. Aveline writes on Theos-Talk:
 
 =======================================================
 All I did was to bring here the testimony of a most respected
 theosophist and author, Mr. Ernest Pelletier, who wrote that it
 is "no practical" to quote from the texts Mr. Caldwell presents as
 authentic, in his website or websites.
 =======================================================
 
 And later in the day Mr. Aveline writes:
 
 ========================================================
 Ernest Pelletier did not comment Caldwell's website. And there was no 
 need for that.  
  
 However, I would welcome any direct commentary from Pelletier or 
 Bruce on the "reliability" of Caldwell's "editorial work", in the 
 internet.  
 ===========================================================
 
 Is Mr. Aveline providing readers here with honest, accurate and 
 reliable statements?????????
 
 Which statement do you believe?  Which statement is true?
 
 The statement by Aveline earlier in the day or the one later in the 
 day???
 
 Daniel
 
 
     
                       

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]