theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

My Three Critiques of Paul Johnson's Thesis about the Masters

Jan 03, 2007 10:35 AM
by danielhcaldwell


My Three Critiques of Paul Johnson's 
Thesis about the Masters Morya and Koot Hoomi
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

BELOW are links to my three critiques of Paul Johnson's thesis about 
the Theosophical Masters.

I could care less what Paul Johnson's motives were or were not for 
writing his books on this subject.  And regardless of what my own 
motivations, etc. are or are not, readers who are interested can 
determine for themselves if my critiques and arguments of Johnson's 
thesis make sense or not, are valid or not, etc.

(1) K. Paul Johnson's House of Cards?:  A Critical Examination of 
Johnson's Thesis on the Theosophical Masters Morya and Koot Hoomi
http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnson.htm

(2) A Closer Look at Some of K. Paul Johnson's Arguments Concerning 
H.S. Olcott's Testimony about the Masters 
http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonparanormal3.htm

(3) "I view M. as a composite character...."
http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnsonmcomposite.htm

Daniel
http://hpb.cc










[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application