Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00945)

Friends,

Jake got nervous, it seems, and he fancies that I said "two lies".  
He is wrong, as usual, as I will try to show.   

1) I said indeed that no "Garrangues" exist in the history of the ULT.  And it is true. John Garrigues existed, not any "Garrangues". I was referring to the fact that Jake's repeated and gross mispelling shows how unacquainted he is with the ULT.

2) I never said that Tillett's postings here on the Theosophy Company  financial matters were true or false, in themselves.   This is Jake's imagination at work.  What I said, yes, is that blind people can only see financial and bureaucratical realities, when they approach spiritual organizations.  It is obvious that a few financial numbers about the Pasadena TS, or Adyar TS, or the "Theosophy Company"   and so on, are not enough to judge either of these organizations, even on financial grounds.  

3) Mohini Chatterjee made similar criticisms against the Theosophical Society while HPB and Olcott were alive, and HPB responded with her now classical text "The Original Programme".  Chatterjee was in fact able to see various "mistakes" and "inconsistencies" in the Theosophical Society in the 1880s. But what was really going on was beyond his conscious rationale of criticisms.  It was his own occult process of falling apart from occult learning which made Chatterjee adopt that viewpoint. Jake is probably navigating in those same kind of 'waters'. 

I guess Ethics is essential to Theosophy,  and for me nothing could ever justify being untruthful.  I am responsible for that before Karma. 


Best regards,   Carlos. 


De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Sat, 30 Dec 2006 05:24:00 -0800 (PST)

Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Avalanche from Aveline ego Mountain

> Another Landslide from Aveline ego Mountain 
> 
> 
> So now Carlos begins to Lie (he thinks 
> it is permissible to defend his style 
> of theosophy - which is what cultists do 
> too.) KH said in the MLs that he almost 
> got pulled into that trap of "ends and 
> means" but got saved by his uncle. He 
> also calls me a girly-man. In personal 
> email he called me a queer and a coward.
> 
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]