Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00651)

Carlos,

I still say that this is based on a wrong mix up between the 
Clermont Chapter and the Jacobin propaganda central in Clermont, and 
a believe in that Starck's influence on Masonry was larger when it 
relay was. All facts were not public when IU was written, but it is 
that today. Consider that.

And read "My Books" by H.P. Blavatsky. IU is not a history book.

"…Isis was full of misprints and misquotations…"

See: http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/isis/iu2-ap2.htm

Carl

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline" 
<carlosaveline@...> wrote:
>
> Dear Friends,
> 
> 
> In "Isis Unveiled", after a few pages describing the process by 
which the Jesuits infiltrated secret societies
> which were dedicated to esoteric wisdom, H.P. Blavatsky quotes a 
historian with whom she agrees, on the
> infiltration of Masonry by the Vatican:
> 
> 
> " `And yet,' says Rebold, `notwithstanding the confusion they had 
created (1736-72), the Jesuits had
> accomplished but one of their designs, viz.: denaturalizing and 
bringing into disrepute the Masonic
> Institution. Having succeeded, as they believed, in destroying it 
in one form, they were determined to use it
> in another. (...) In this combination Catholicism governed all, 
and the whole fabrications moved upon wheels,
> representing the great object for which the Society of Jesus was 
organized.' (`General History of
> Freemansonry', p. 218)" (1)
> 
> And two pages later HPB writes:
> 
> "The simple truth is that modern Masonry is a sadly different 
thing from what the once universal secret
> fraternity was in the days when the Brahma-worshippers of the AUM 
exachanged grips and passwords with the
> devotees of TUM (...)." (2)
> 
> 
> Best regards, Carlos.
> 
> 
> 
> NOTES:
> 
> (1) "Isis Unveiled", H.P. Blavatsky, T.U.P., Pasadena, CA, USA, 
vol I, see p. 385.
> 
> (2) "Isis Unveiled", H.P. Blavatsky, T.U.P., p. 387.
> 
> ooooooooooooooooo
>