Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00554)

Carlos,
We (that is you and I, by your implication) do not share any curiousity  in regard to Daniel's silence. 
I am sick fed up of the whole issue, Daniel's motives are Daniel's motives, as yours are yours.  You keep on flogging the same dead horse.  Do you think anyone in 20 years will give a hoot what Carlos or Daniel had to say???

Cass

carlosaveline <carlosaveline@terra.com.br> wrote:                                  Cass, 
 
 Gathering together clear and honest accusations of fraud and wrongdoing against Daniel Caldwell is not slandering. It's giving him an opportunity to explain and to defend himself. 
 
 Solovyof waited for HPB's death to start doing that which Daniel does now. 
 
 Get the point? 
 
 Johnson presents his evidences, and Caldwell flees from the subject. 
 
 On Caldwell's public actions in the theosophical movement (open or under cover) you have testimonies by Paul Johnson, Jerry Ekin, Ernest Pelletier, Mark Jacqua, Sufilight and so on. 
 
 And a most meaningful silence from Mr. Caldwell, of course.
 
 Of course, he has the right to remain silent. 
 
 But if Mr. Caldwell is not a fraud, why not to clarify the issue, Cass? I will not judge or label him, any way. I just share with you my sincere curiosity on the reasons for his persisting silence. 
 
 Carlos. 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
     
                       

 
---------------------------------
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]