theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

To Carl Ek: So is the "Secretary General" an officer??

Dec 07, 2006 08:04 PM
by danielhcaldwell


To Carl Ek,

You wrote:

===========================================================
Carlos, you wrote; "The ULT is no corporation. It has no officers."
Do you remember the yellow card you signed to become an associate?
On one side was the Declaration, and on the other side you
read; "Being in sympathy with the purposes of this Lodge, as set
forth in its "Declaration," I hereby record my desire to be enrolled
as an Associate, it being understood that such association calls for
no obligation on my part, other than that which I, myself,
determine." Do you remember? Under this was the line where you wrote
your name, and under that was two lines. Under the left line was the
word "Secretary" and under the under the right one "Secretary
General". No officer? No, of course not!?
=========================================================

So is the "Secretary General" an officer and if not an "officer",
then what is this person?

Also who elects or appoints this person to be "Secretary General"???

Is this written out somewhere for all associates and even the public 
to read?

Same questions apply to "Secretary".

Daniel





[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application