Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00234)

NEEDED:  An Impartial - Not Imaginary - 
Sketch of Crosbie's Life   

Some time ago on Theos-Talk, Carl Ek was kind enough to reproduce an 
article about Robert Crosbie as published in "The Theosophical 
Forum", July 1936, pp. 76-77.

"The Theosophical Forum" was the official magazine of the Point Loma
Theosophical Society while G. de Purucker was leader.

Towards the end of the article, the writer made the following 
significant statement:

============================================================
Is it just to Robert Crosbie to IGNORE these statements of historic
fact, or to SUPPRESS them [as some ULT writers do]? They help to 
complete the true picture and must be included in an impartial - not 
imaginary - sketch of Crosbie's life.
==========================================================
caps added

For the life of me, I can't understand why some vocal Theosophical 
writers want and even demand an impartial and accurate account of 
C.W. Leadbeater's life and yet apparently at the same time show no 
interest in having an IMPARTIAL and ACCURATE biographical account of 
Crosbie's life.

I know that a number of Theosophical students want to have impartial 
accounts of both men's lives and not the imaginary ones that some of 
their "followers" have written and published.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc