Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00153)

Friends, 

Mr. Daniel should not compare what I talk about the ULT with what I talk about the Adyar TS.  Daniel is wrong in doing that. Comparing the ULT, an informal network of students,  with a formal Society or corporation,  is obviously inaccurate.  

Mr. Daniel should compare what I talk about the ULT with what  I talk about the Adyar ES, for instance.  The Adyar ES, as the ULT, is not a corporation. 

True, the ULT is not an ES.  That's why  I talk much more about the ULT than about the Adyar ES.  Both deserve some respect, although I make no secret I see lots of problems inthe Adyar movement. 

ULT is away from the formal and bureaucratic life of formal Societies or corporations. 

I wrote about that today.  


There is a  proverb in Brazil which says:  "the worst deaf is the deaf who does not want to hear."    

I'm sure this is not the case of Mr. Caldwell.   


Best regards,   Carlos. 


De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Mon, 04 Dec 2006 17:57:57 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Two very different styles?

> When writing on the Adyar T.S. and Leadbeater for Theos-Talk, Mr.
> Aveline usually writes in a very down-to- earth, clear-cut and
> forthright way or style giving specifics and facts.
> 
> But when replying to posts or questions about the ULT, DES and Crosbie,
> Mr. Aveline seems to use a totally different style. It is almost
> like he lapses into a vague ULTese way of writing which seems to be
> almost devoid of specifics and facts.
> 
> Does he really write in these two very different styles?
> 
> And if so, WHY?
> 
> Daniel


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]