Theos-Talk Archives (December 2006 Message tt00029)

Carlos,
Two things.
First so remember I that you previous here has denied that Crosbie 
claimed that he was representing the "true" Second Section and 
restored the Third Section, in a respond to me were you said that I 
was wrong.. Now you are quoting TenBroeck, were he is saying that he 
did claimed that, and TenBroeck of course believed him: 

"Robert Crosbie preserved unbroken the link of the Second Section
of the Theosophical Movement from the passing of Mr. Judge in
1896, and in 1907--just eleven years later--made that link once
more Four Square amongst men. In the year 1909 the Third Section
was restored by the formation of the United Lodge of
Theosophists. In 1912 he founded the magazine THEOSOPHY
"THY. 7 - 289; THY 3 - 187/8; THE ULT, ITS MISSION & FUTURE,
p.8."

See; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/38183

And secondly.
You did put on question marks when I ask about if someone here had 
any information on that Crosbie was chartered by Hargrove in 1906-
07, see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/38019
Now you are quoting TenBroeck, who wrote that this was the case:

"1906
Organized Theosophical meetings were first held by Mr. Crosbie
under a charter obtained from the T S in A that Hargrove had
reformed, after splitting away from the Point Loma TS, in New
York in 1898/99. This had attracted a number of Mr. Judge's
earlier companions including Dr. A. Keightley and his wife,
Julia, better known as "Jasper Neimand." THY 23-544-5'

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/38183

The question is; Way are you quoting someone that you consider to be 
wrong?
Or was he wrong from your opinion this time or can you now admit 
that you were wrong?

Could you please, explain this, hence everything TenBroeck said 
seems to be `ex cathedra' for you? 

Carl