Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt01420)

Carlos,

In my posting which can be read at
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/38146>
I quote Dallas Tenbroeck's comments on Robert Crosbie.

You reply:

========================================================
You don't have respect for a lifelong theosophist as Dallas,  who 
left out his  physical body a few months ago and concluded his 
incarnation dedicated to the good of mankind, do you?

You have to involve the memory of our co-brother Dallas in 
controversy, don't you, even now, don't you? 
========================================================

But Carlos it was only yesterday (Nov. 29) that YOU YOURSELF wrote to 
me:

==========================================================
You should at least read for once the excellent text by our common 
late friend  Dallas Tenbroeck, "Biographical Notes on Robert 
Crosbie". If you lost it, let me know -- I can bring here a copy 
again.
=========================================================
Quoted from:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/38079

Well, I did go and read Dallas' text and even quoted from it.

And yes I did say that there were errors in Dallas' text.  I'm sorry 
but that is true.

Therefore you yourself first brought up Dallas and his text on Robert 
Crosbie.  Not I.

Therefore you opened the door for my reply and I gave it.

I was not showing disrespect for Dallas.  As I have said before I 
found Dallas to be a really nice man and Theosophist.  Something I 
can't say for a person or two currently on Theos-Talk.  :)

And I am sorry that he died.  But you brought up his name and the 
subject first, and I simply responded.

But of course you would rather DISTRACT instead of directly dealing 
with the subject matter which is ....  ROBERT CROSBIE.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc