Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt01353)

Hi,
Unfortunatelly, time is limitted - have no internet at home - so it 
will be short.
As far as I can hear, your arguments are based on personal 
values/beliefs/conclusions, and so in essence grounded in 
ideational, analytical self-deception.
I would inquire with you, into the significance of "comparative" 
activities, your misunderstanding concernign the function of the 
Foundations, what the 'I' is, _your_ impression of it as a cult, etc.

But i leave that with you, to inquire into, if interested.
Regards,
Jb


--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline" 
<carlosaveline@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Friends,
> 
> It is ironical, perhaps, to see that Jiddu Krishnamurti, who 
talked so much against the "I",  and who often said "the speaker is 
not important" in his talks, ended up having his personal name used 
in the "Krishnamurti Foundations".
> 
> His sole proposition, or that of his followers,  seems to be 
himself.
> 
> Years ago I went to the Krishnamurti Foundation in California. 
There is nothing but material with Krishnamurti, there.  Only his 
books, tapes and videos. No comparative study, no other author, no 
books except his own, nothing. Only his personality, which was said 
to be not important.  There is an air of personalistic cult around 
him. Since the times he used to be Christ.  
> 
> Carlos. 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>