Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt01200)

Daniel,

(Sorry, I had to correct typing mistakes in this message.)

I previous said, and you quoted: 

================================================
As to the evidence mentioned by Tillett -- as I remember it -- it 
includes something very simple. John Algeo simply had no time to do the 
research himself, or with his "editorial committee" (to which you 
belong, at least in name).
================================================

You called this a "misrepresentation". 

So see this: 


By 20 April 2006, Gregory Tillett posted a text in Theos-talk questioning the editorial Ethics (or lack of Ethics) exercised by John Algeo and the TPH-USA. 

He says: 


?The claim that John?s research was not included in the Algeo volume is ? let me use plain language ? a blatant, scandalous and bare-faced lie. I have beside me as I write (i) the Algeo volume, (ii) John?s PhD thesis on the Blavatsky letters and (iii) a copy of the manuscript sent by John to the TPH before his death. If I compare them I find sentence after sentence reproduced but for a word or two.
Does anyone seriously believe that, between the time of John?s death and the publication of the Algeo volume, the complete text was re-researched and created anew? Including letters that John had discovered? Without any reliance on John?s work, Algeo or his puppets, acting independently, just happened to find the same material??


Daniel, please read it again: 

"Does anyone seriously believe that, between the time of John?s death and the publication of the Algeo volume, the complete text was re-researched and created anew? Including letters that John had discovered? Without any reliance on John?s work, Algeo or his puppets, acting independently, just happened to find the same material??

Do you honestly believe that,  Daniel? 

Have you seen Tillett's inherent evidence now? 
If you are an honest people, Daniel, which I can accept, why helping Algeo in the theft? Or did you not help him?  Will you clarify this to us all ? 


Regards, Carlos. 
oooooooo

De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Sat, 25 Nov 2006 16:19:52 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Latest Misrepresentations?

> Theos-Talk Readers:
> 
> See Mr. Carlos Aveline's latest posting
> on the Algeo/Tillett HPB Letters Controversy at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/37908
> 
> In this posting, Mr. Aveline continues to make all sorts of dubious 
> assumptions and makes statements that simply are not accurate.
> 
> For example, Mr. Aveline writes:
> 
> =============================================================
> As to the evidence mentioned by Tillett -- as I remember it -- it 
> includes something very simple. John Algeo simply had no time to do the 
> research himself, or with his "editorial committee" (to which you 
> belong, at least in name).
> =============================================================


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]