Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt01082)

So Carlos are you now admitting 
that you were wrong when you wrote....
-----------------------------------------------

Carlos,

You write:

=======================================================
If we are thinking of unidentified fake letters, I don't change a 
word in my position.

But as the dialogue evolves, more information gets available.

Principles do not change, the information available expands all the 
time.

My posting of months ago is perfect for that moment.

Only stupid persons do not allow their view of things evolve as they 
get more info.

I came to know later that Cooper was personally honest.
=======================================================

What you write above is apparently in answer to what I posted at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/37801

Carlos, what are you trying to tell us here?

John Cooper originally wrote:

"All letters written by H.P.B. will be included. These will include
letters whose authenticity is doubtful, as will be indicated in the
editorial apparatus."

Are you saying that you NOW agree with John Cooper's original 
statement and that you NOW disavow your own original posting in which 
you called his above statement "double-thinking"?

Are you now admitting that his original statement quoted above is 
NOT "double-thinking" and that you were wrong in ascribing such a 
characterization to his statement?? 

Daniel
http://hpb.cc