Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt01031)

Carlos now writes on Theos-Talk:

========================================================
The editorial policy followed by John Algeo and the USA TPH in 
editing the volume one of "HPB Letters, False and Authentic" -- is 
clearly way outside the common sense criteria proposed by Tillett.
=======================================================

Now we see Carlos praising Tillett's "common sense criteria" but
notice what Carlos previously wrote on Theos-Talk:

========================================================
...Tillett seems to defend THE PUBLICATION of false letters and
libels in general, IF they are identified as 'doubtful'. This is
something which no true historian would do.... 
caps added.
========================================================

So was Carlos previously telling us on Theos-Talk that Tillett's view 
clearly shows that Tillett was "no true historian"?

Yet now has Carlos changed his "tune", has he changed his mind, and 
now even takes the time and effort to point out Tillet's "common 
sense criteria"?

Questions to ponder on.....even if Carlos chooses to ignore them.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc