Theos-Talk Archives (November 2006 Message tt00572)

Well said, Bill.   I think we all know who you might be referring to.   
Although, I haven't read any of such stuff lately, since I place those sender's 
name's in my spam filter's auto trash list as soon as they are recognized.   If 
everyone had the facility to do that, there would be no more problems with such 
mail box cluttering trolls as soon as they are recognized.   It's also easy 
to trash any letters from such person's direct correspondents (who you may want 
to read for other reasons) by checking the subject lines first.

Len


In a message dated 11/9/06 4:56:35 PM, meredith_bill@earthlink.net writes:


> Friends,
> 
> One who presumes to think for others can't or will not hear their own
> conscience.  Such a person often develops the habit of saying exactly
> the same thing as their "opponent" only changing the polarity.  I call
> this tat-for-tit reasoning.
> 
> Such a person is arrogant.
> 
> Their habit of hearing only what they say and seeing only what they
> write being reflected back to them by their "opponent" is an automated
> response of which they are little aware and even less in control.   They
> are unmindful of anyone else, reflexively seeing only themselves as
> central to every discussion.
> 
> The result is that they are playing a children's imitation-game wherein
> they talk at  make-believe friends, cheerfully telling them the error of
> their thinking.  They play hide and seek with their own ego and always
> when they are recognized for what they truly are they run to hide behind
> their tattered cloak of brotherhood.  There is no dialogue in this game,
> there is only a single point of view and opinion presented as though
> presenting fish to a helpless and hungry multitude of "friends".
> 
> Nothing of  significance comes from such drivel.  I have wasted my last
> minute reading it.
> 
> --bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]