"Le Droit" Versus Adyar
Nov 09, 2006 03:57 AM
by carlosaveline
Carl,
Thanks.
Of course, there are modern masonic organizations which claim to be "ancient".
Each corporation has its own legitimizing discourse, etc.
But for me it is enough to see that HPB made something very different from involving herself in the masonic movement.
She studied the masonic philosophy, as she studied every other important philosophy around the world, and she created the theosophical movement as the initial nucleus for the preparation of future civilizations.
As Geoffrey Farthing and all available evidences indicate, she was never initiated in any ritualistic organization in her 19th century lifetime.
Carlos.
De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
Cópia:
Data:Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:03:35 -0000
Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: "Le Droit" Versus Adyar
> Carlos,
>
> I don't think HPB was wrong, not at al (and I, and very few others
> as well, can't remember everything she wrote), I agree with here.
> Simple because "Modern Masonry" and "Ancient Freemasonry" (the two
> terms of the two main branches of today's, as well as during
> Blavatsky's time, Masonry), are not the same thing. If one studies
> the structures of Masonry, one will find a very distinct border,
> going straight thru the whole Masonic Movement (separating
> individual from individual, the Modern is in majority in the US, but
> in Europe it is impossible, for my anyway, to say which category
> which is in majority). This border separates those who know, respect
> and search the true origin and Spirit of Freemasonry, from those who
> see the Masonic lodge (clubs) as a "dinner club" (HPB said that
> those do not disserve, and should not, to be promoted over the third
> degree, MM) and believe in the myth of 1717 and middle age cathedral
> builders.
>
> Your words "will not act in Masonic organizations", am I not
> agreeing with at al. Every Theosophist that also is a Freemason has
> an obligation to enlighten one's Masonic Brethren about the True,
> just as Cagliostro did. In the archives of the Grand Lodge in
> Copenhagen of the "Danish Order of Freemasons" (the Swedish Rite) is
> an very interesting document of on lodge meeting, where Cagliostro
> was present and held an lecture about reincarnation on the lights of
> the Masonic symbols. Every Theosophist which also is a Freemason
> should act, as good as one can, in the footsteps of Cagliostro.
>
> About the relation between TS Adyar and "Le Droit Humain". That "Le
> Droit Humain" was a part of the Adyar-Movement was a Maya with in
> the TS Adyar, and not with in the "Le Droit Humain". I will no say
> that my "your personal experience is", is so very, "limited". My
> first contact with a member (she was traditional Co-Masonic, and an
> Ancient Freemason) of the Supreme Counsel in Paris was in 1998 (this
> was before the leadbearerian rite was forbidden), and she described
> very well the internal conflicts, and relations between the two
> divisions. It was more or less two orders, working under the same
> name. In many cities, were two "Le Droit Humain" lodges (one
> traditional and one leadbeaterian) present, with, often, no contacts
> at al.
>
> That the leadbeaterians left the "Le Droit Humain" was good for
> both. So agree with you, it was an "unhealthy mixture".
>
> Carl
>
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> wrote:
> >
> > Carl,
> >
> > The words you quote -- "modern disciples of the Masters have
> nothing to do with modern Masonry" -- were written by HPB, and not
> by me. You may think HPB was wrong, etc.
> >
> > As I understand these words, though, HPB means that disciples will
> not mix own their activities with any masonic or ritualistic
> actions/organizations. And will not act in masonic organizations.
> >
> > They will study masonic ideals, philosophy and tradition in
> abstract, like HPB did. She wrote a lot about Masonry, yet she did
> not want any confusion between the masonic movement and the
> theosophical movement.
> >
> > If you had the actual experience I and hundreds of people have
> with the Adyar theosophical movement (not talking about Brazil
> only) you would not say that there was never confusion and wrong
> intermixing between "Le Droit Humain" and the Adyar TS. If you
> think different, that is your right. But if you insist, I will
> possibly conclude that your personal experience is limited -- or
> else your view one-sided. And that is for a reason.
> >
> > The event of actual separation between "Adyar TS & Masonry"
> from "Le Droit Humain" was most painful for both parties;
> traumatic for many people; involved acute power struggle, and was
> international.
> >
> > I respect your hurt feelings, but facts are facts. There was an
> unhealthy mixture before separation and "divorce" -- hence the pain
> and trauma involved.
> >
> > Carlos.
> >
> > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Cópia:
> >
> > Data:Wed, 08 Nov 2006 10:35:02 -0000
> >
> > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: CARL, ON WHAT I SAY
> >
> > > Carlos,
> > > If "modern disciples of the Masters "have nothing to do with
> modern
> > > Masonry". Can you then tell me way Western Masonry is an
> obligatory
> > > study for all Eastern Chelas?
> > >
> > > And please stop claim that "Le Droit Humain" has been a part of
> the
> > > Theosophical Movement, or TS Adyar or what ever. It has never,
> and
> > > never will be that.
> > >
> > > And to find HPB students in the "Le Droit Humain" today is
> possible,
> > > hence the leadbeaterians are out.
> > >
> > > I was for many years' member in a lodge, working partly under
> the
> > > Grand Lodge of Stockholm. I left hence the Swedish Order of
> > > Freemasonry and the Swedish Rite is infiltrated by Lutheran
> priest.
> > > On horrifying example of this is that the priests don't have to
> > > where white gloves, hence they as priests can't have been
> involved
> > > in the "murder of Hiram Abiff" (a Masonic symbol, for the none
> > > masons). Nonsense! So I went some where else.
> > >
> > > Carl
> > >
> > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Carl,
> > > >
> > > > I was talking, and am talking, about the fact that HPB was not
> > > initiated in any masonic or kind-of-masonic organization; I was
> > > talking about the fact that
> > > > she received masonic diplomas (at least two) as a homage, and
> not
> > > because she had been initiated in any Rite or masonic
> organization;
> > > I was talking about the fact that according to HPB, modern
> disciples
> > > of the Masters "have nothing to do with modern Masonry", as you
> can
> > > see, with all due bibliographical references, in an earlier
> message
> > > from me, today. (I can repeat the message if you want.)
> > > >
> > > > This is not meant as an offence to anyone's feelings.
> > > >
> > > > I respect "Le Droit Humain" and other masonic orders, although
> I
> > > consider that they are not part of the theosophical movement as
> > > designed by the Masters and HPB.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards, Carlos.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > >
> > > > Cópia:
> > > >
> > > > Data:Tue, 07 Nov 2006 05:19:14 -0000
> > > >
> > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: Words and Words
> > > >
> > > > > Carlos,
> > > > >
> > > > > No, that wasn't clear!
> > > > >
> > > > > Carl
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carl,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I was not talking about the word "Adoption".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Wasn't it clear?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Carlos.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Data:Mon, 06 Nov 2006 14:05:15 -0000
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: HPB and Her Mason Friends
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I see that I have to say it again;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Masonic term "Adoption" DOES NOT mean honorary, it
> means
> > > > > that it
> > > > > > > is female Masonry. The origin of the term is from
> France, in
> > > the
> > > > > > > 1770', when Masonic lodge was founded for women, or
> mixed.
> > > Hence
> > > > > > > women can't (from their point of view, and then of
> course)
> > > rule
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > lodge them self, these female lodges was "Adopted" by a
> male
> > > > > lodge,
> > > > > > > and the Lodge Mistress reported to the Worshipful Master
> of
> > > the
> > > > > male
> > > > > > > lodge, that had adopted the female lodge.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A Masonic term, is a Masonic term, and what the civil
> > > society,
> > > > > use
> > > > > > > the same word, dose not matter.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Carl,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > We both knew and still know what is "Adoption".
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > HPB did not go to "Masonic meetings".
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So it was a homage, an honorary title, if I may use my
> own
> > > > > words.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can use your words for the same fact.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Yet she was not an active Mason, only a "honorary"
> one.
> > > She
> > > > > had
> > > > > > > friends there.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Carlos.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Data:Mon, 06 Nov 2006 02:27:25 -0000
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: CARL NOW DOES CLARIFY!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Carlos,
> > > > > > > > > You wrote: "So there is NOTHING about HPB being an
> > > active
> > > > > member
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > any ritualistic
> > > > > > > > > Organizations in the 19 century."
> > > > > > > > > Don't twist it around now, for the discussion was if
> she
> > > > > ever
> > > > > > > was an
> > > > > > > > > active mason or not, and on that my answer is that I
> > > have
> > > > > never
> > > > > > > seen
> > > > > > > > > that. And if she participates in any Masonic lodge
> > > meeting,
> > > > > I
> > > > > > > don't
> > > > > > > > > know. But if she come, they surely hade let her in.
> > > > > > > > > But she was a member of more then two Masonic
> orders,
> > > and
> > > > > one of
> > > > > > > > > this the A.P.R.M. was honorary. The others (inkl.
> Sat
> > > Bhai),
> > > > > > > read
> > > > > > > > > for you self:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > "My Masonic experience ? if you will so term
> membership
> > > in
> > > > > > > several
> > > > > > > > > Eastern Masonic fraternities and esoteric
> brotherhoods ?
> > > is
> > > > > > > confined
> > > > > > > > > to the Orient." (HPB Speaks, vol. I p. 31)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You wrote: "As to her 'honorary membership' -- take
> a
> > > look
> > > > > at
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > facsimile copy of HPB's masonic "Adoption" diploma
> > > in "HPB
> > > > > > > Speaks".
> > > > > > > > > That is honorary, no doubt."
> > > > > > > > > The Masonic term "Adoption" DOES NOT mean honorary,
> it
> > > means
> > > > > > > that it
> > > > > > > > > is female Masonry. The origin of the term is from
> > > France, in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > 1770', when Masonic lodge was founded for women, or
> > > mixed.
> > > > > Hence
> > > > > > > > > women can't (from their point of view, and then of
> > > course)
> > > > > rule
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > lodge them self, these female lodges was "Adopted"
> by a
> > > male
> > > > > > > lodge,
> > > > > > > > > and the Lodge Mistress reported to the Worshipful
> Master
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > male
> > > > > > > > > lodge, that had adopted the female lodge.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > And plus the Theosophical Society and The Esoteric
> > > School of
> > > > > > > > > Theosophy, of course. The rituals of TS (written by
> > > Olcott
> > > > > 1876)
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > EST (based on the old TS-rituals, and rewritten by
> HPB
> > > 1888)
> > > > > > > were
> > > > > > > > > inspired of Masonic rituals. In Sweden (in the three
> > > > > society,
> > > > > > > Point
> > > > > > > > > Loma, Adyar and the Independent Swedish TS), this
> > > rituals
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > used
> > > > > > > > > in till after the 1900. I have seen a photograph
> from a
> > > > > Pasadena
> > > > > > > EST-
> > > > > > > > > meeting in Helsingborg from the early 1950's. They
> were
> > > al
> > > > > > > dressed
> > > > > > > > > up in dress cotes, wearing the EST-jewels (stars, as
> > > > > designed by
> > > > > > > KT,
> > > > > > > > > or on her order) and the lodge room was lighted with
> > > > > candelabras
> > > > > > > > > (there is no doute what it was; hence one clearly
> can
> > > see
> > > > > HPB's,
> > > > > > > M's
> > > > > > > > > and KH's portraits in the background and one of the
> > > > > participants
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > know in person very well). In 2003, we arrange the
> > > > > > > > > last "celebration" of the White Lotus Day in
> Gothenburg,
> > > > > after a
> > > > > > > > > ritual written 1889 by Dr Gustaf Zander, President-
> > > Founder
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the TS
> > > > > > > > > in Sweden, Judge's Agent for EST in Scandinavia,
> > > disciple of
> > > > > > > Jasper
> > > > > > > > > Niemand and corresponding with Judge in till 1896.
> This
> > > was
> > > > > > > arranged
> > > > > > > > > together by Pasadena TS and the Swedish TS. 68
> people
> > > were
> > > > > > > present,
> > > > > > > > > and I was in chair.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Don't say that there has not been or are no rituals
> in
> > > the
> > > > > TM.
> > > > > > > They
> > > > > > > > > are there, and have been there from the very
> beginning
> > > > > (1876).
> > > > > > > If
> > > > > > > > > branches want to work with them, they are free to do
> so,
> > > if
> > > > > they
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > want to, when don't have to. It is the same in
> Adyar,
> > > today,
> > > > > to.
> > > > > > > I
> > > > > > > > > know Adyar lodges that still have a ritual (not the
> same
> > > as
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > original, as far as I know) to initiate new members.
> I
> > > was
> > > > > > > present
> > > > > > > > > in one in 1994 (The Wesak Lodge in Sweden).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Carl,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So there is NOTHING about HPB being an active
> member
> > > of
> > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > ritualistic organizations in the 19 century. (See
> > > below).
> > > > > > > > > Excellent, my brother. Facts are facts and this
> absence
> > > of
> > > > > > > > > evidences is a FACT, for sure.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > As to her 'honorary membership' -- take a look at
> the
> > > > > > > facsimile
> > > > > > > > > copy of HPB's masonic "Adoption" diploma in "HPB
> > > Speaks".
> > > > > That
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > honorary, no doubt.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Note that HPB denounced in most vehement terms
> > > > > the "ceremonial
> > > > > > > > > magic" as a practice for the 19th century.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > She probably could smelll the uselessness, nay,
> the
> > > > > > > harmfulness of
> > > > > > > > > it in the Aquarius Age...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Regards, Carlos.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Data:Sat, 04 Nov 2006 14:51:39 -0000
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: HPB and Sat B'hai
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Carlos,
> > > > > > > > > > > My answers are in capital letters.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but whare is the desmonstration that HPB
> was
> > > ever
> > > > > > > active
> > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > such a a
> > > > > > > > > > > movement? NOTHING, AND THERE IS NOTHING ABOUT
> > > > > ANY "HONORARY
> > > > > > > > > MEMBERS"
> > > > > > > > > > > EITHER.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Did she write about that in a letter not forged?
> > > What
> > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > > originals of her
> > > > > > > > > > > statement that she belonged to it? ASK TILLETT,
> AND
> > > THE
> > > > > > > > > RESEARCHERS
> > > > > > > > > > > IN QC IN LONDON.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Did any of her contemporaries (loyal
> theosophists)
> > > write
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > > an active
> > > > > > > > > > > membership? NO< ANF I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT
> EITHER.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > What did Olcott tie about this? SORRY, BUT I
> DON"T
> > > > > > > UNDERSTAND
> > > > > > > > > THIS
> > > > > > > > > > > QUESTION. SAY IT IN OUTHER WORDS, PLEASE.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > And then, Boris de Zirkoff? S. Cranston? Did
> Boris
> > > > > include
> > > > > > > > > anything
> > > > > > > > > > > about that
> > > > > > > > > > > in HPB's Collected Writings? WAY DO ASK THAT TO
> ME?
> > > > > SORRY,
> > > > > > > THEY
> > > > > > > > > ARE
> > > > > > > > > > > BOTH DEAD, IF THEY WASEN'T, YOU SHOULD HAVE
> ASKED
> > > THEM
> > > > > THAT,
> > > > > > > AND
> > > > > > > > > NOT
> > > > > > > > > > > ME. I THINK THERE IS A FOTNOT IN BCW, BUT I HAVE
> TO
> > > LOOK
> > > > > TO
> > > > > > > BE
> > > > > > > > > SURE.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I am talking about good old theosophical
> sources.
> > > (You
> > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > there is
> > > > > > > > > > > a lot of
> > > > > > > > > > > people talking to HPB and the Masters around the
> > > corner
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > useing
> > > > > > > > > > > their names
> > > > > > > > > > > for their own purposes.) YES, I KNOW THAT VERY
> MUCH.
> > > BUT
> > > > > THE
> > > > > > > > > FACT
> > > > > > > > > > > THAT THERE ARE THINGS ABOUT HBP AND THE MASTER,
> THAT
> > > YOU
> > > > > > > DON'T
> > > > > > > > > > > HAPPENED TO LIKE, DOESEN'T MAKE THEM UNTRUE OR
> FALSE.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --- In theos-
> talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Carl,
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, but whare is the desmonstration that
> HPB
> > > was
> > > > > ever
> > > > > > > > > active in
> > > > > > > > > > > such a a movement?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Did she write about that in a letter not
> forged?
> > > What
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > > originals of her statement that she belonged to
> it?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Did any of her contemporaries (loyal
> theosophists)
> > > > > write
> > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > > such an active membership?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > What did Olcott tie about this?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > And then, Boris de Zirkoff? S. Cranston? Did
> Boris
> > > > > include
> > > > > > > > > > > anything about that in HPB's Collected Writings?
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > I am talking about good old theosophical
> sources.
> > > (You
> > > > > > > know
> > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > > > is a lot of people talking to HPB and the
> Masters
> > > around
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > corner
> > > > > > > > > > > or useing their names for their own purposes.)
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > In bona fide, Carlos.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Data:Sat, 04 Nov 2006 13:26:42 -0000
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Assunto:[Spam] Theos-World Re: HPB and Sat
> B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Carlos,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > See the "Sat Bhai Code" below. Do you see
> > > anything
> > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > > > > any "honorary member" there?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Carl
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> ______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > > > > CODE
> > > > > > > > > > > > > OF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > THE ROYAL ORIENTAL ORDER
> > > > > > > > > > > > > OF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > SIKHA (APEX) AND THE SAT BHAI
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > RAHU
> > > > > > > > > > > > > REPRESENTATIVE OF ARTIRAM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > AND OF
> > > > > > > > > > > > > THE SAT BHAI OF PRAG
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > THE CODE OF SIKHA (APEX), &c.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (1) This Oriental Order embraces the Perfect
> > > > > Terrestrial
> > > > > > > > > Zone of
> > > > > > > > > > > 360
> > > > > > > > > > > > > degrees, and the Mystic Zone inclusive of
> all
> > > > > others,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > occupies
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the highest point of the Masonic fabric.
> > > Therefore,
> > > > > > > while
> > > > > > > > > under
> > > > > > > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > > > > > > benign influence, justice is done to all,
> and
> > > > > > > innovations
> > > > > > > > > > > > > inconsistent with the grand principles of
> > > harmony,
> > > > > and a
> > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > > > > equality, regulated to the varied
> circumstances
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > social
> > > > > > > > > > > scale,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > are righteously condemned.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (2) This Paramount Order is divided into
> two,
> > > > > namely,
> > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > Sikha
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (Apex), the Supreme and Ultimate Mundane,
> and of
> > > the
> > > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > > Bhai of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pryaya.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (3) It is a fundamental principle, that
> there
> > > has
> > > > > been a
> > > > > > > > > regular
> > > > > > > > > > > > > succession from the East of the whole Order;
> but
> > > > > more
> > > > > > > > > especially
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Sat Bhai, and without this succession,
> the
> > > chief
> > > > > > > title
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Order to universal respect could not exist.
> This
> > > > > being
> > > > > > > so,
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor by whom the succession has been kept
> up,
> > > and
> > > > > > > such
> > > > > > > > > > > Sponsors
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as have been adopted into it, must in their
> dual
> > > > > > > capacity,
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > well
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as individually, be incapable of deposition
> or
> > > > > > > supersession,
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > without them, and the possession by the
> original
> > > > > Sponsor
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Red
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ribbon of the Order, there could not
> possibly be
> > > any
> > > > > > > > > succession,
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > consequently there could be no Order.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (4) But, inasmuch as worldly considerations,
> in
> > > > > their
> > > > > > > narrow
> > > > > > > > > > > sense,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > are alien to the spiritual instructions of
> the
> > > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > > > > they
> > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > been permitted to delegate their
> administrative
> > > and
> > > > > > > > > executive
> > > > > > > > > > > > > powers, in large measure, to the Arch
> Censors,
> > > who
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > accordingly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > charged with such duties, while the
> legislative
> > > > > > > function,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > veto, personal as well as dual, remains with
> the
> > > > > former,
> > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unalienable inheritance, within the Perfect
> > > Circle,
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > transmitted
> > > > > > > > > > > > > by the Sat Bhai of Pryaya.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (5) At any moment of supreme peril to the
> > > occidental
> > > > > > > home of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Order of Sikha (Apex), and of the Sat Bhai,
> it
> > > shall
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > imperative duty of the First Sponsor, who
> holds
> > > the
> > > > > Red
> > > > > > > > > Ribbon
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Order, to summon the Arch Arbiter, the
> > > Second
> > > > > > > Sponsor,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Censor, and in their presence to break
> the
> > > seal
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > letter
> > > > > > > > > > > > > from Prag, that contains the special mandate
> of
> > > the
> > > > > Lord
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Perfect Circle, and of the Sat Bhai, such
> > > mandate
> > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > > > absolutely
> > > > > > > > > > > > > irresistible, and of effect over the whole
> of
> > > this
> > > > > Code.
> > > > > > > And
> > > > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the exception of this one reservation, this
> Code
> > > > > shall
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > irrevocable and incapable of abrogation, and
> the
> > > > > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Censors are charged with its application to
> the
> > > > > > > organisation
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mystic subjects of the Lord of the Perfect
> > > > > Terrestrial
> > > > > > > Zone.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) Within the Perfect Circle, the mystic
> > > numbers
> > > > > Nine
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > Seven
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > pre-eminent, and while the Lord of the
> Perfect
> > > > > Circle
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsors complete the higher number, the
> lower,
> > > > > under
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > immediate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > influence of the Sat Bhai, is subdivided
> into
> > > seven
> > > > > > > classes,
> > > > > > > > > > > namely:-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (1). Arch Censors. (2). Arch Couriers. (3).
> Arch
> > > > > > > Ministers.
> > > > > > > > > (4).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Heralds. (5). Arch Scribes. (6). Arch
> > > Auditors.
> > > > > > > (7).
> > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mutes.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (7) The Arch Censors, being of the highest
> > > dignity
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > > > > Bhai,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rule the six subordinate classes, and each,
> in
> > > his
> > > > > own
> > > > > > > > > > > jurisdiction,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is paramount. In this grade all are equal,
> and
> > > there
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > > > priority.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (8) Each Member of each Censorial Section of
> the
> > > six
> > > > > > > > > subordinate
> > > > > > > > > > > > > classes, shall be known personaily only to
> his
> > > own
> > > > > > > Censor,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Sponsors under the Lord of the Perfect
> Zone
> > > and
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > chain
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > secrecy as well as of responsibility
> (nccessary
> > > for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > exclusion of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the uninitiated), every second link is
> locked
> > > > > downwards
> > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > symbols,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > signs and countersignshence, the Arch Censor
> is
> > > only
> > > > > > > known
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > > > own Arch Couriers, each of the latter to his
> own
> > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > Ministers,
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > so on.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (9) No one can be admitted to the four
> higher
> > > > > classes of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhai who has not been previously initiated
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > > Mystery of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Freemasonry; and it is a fundamental decree,
> > > that
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > classes
> > > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Censor, and Arch Courier are closed against
> all
> > > but
> > > > > > > Master
> > > > > > > > > > > Masons,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and those of higher degree. But the three
> lower
> > > > > classes
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > open
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > both sexes, at the discretion of each Arch
> > > Censor,
> > > > > > > within
> > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > own
> > > > > > > > > > > > > jurisdiction.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (10) In order to preserve the due relation
> > > between
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > various
> > > > > > > > > > > > > grades, and to distinguish those of greater
> > > > > exaltation,
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > system
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > numbers pervades the whole, so that each
> > > individual
> > > > > may
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > clearly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > distinguished. But mystic names, conferred
> by
> > > the
> > > > > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > > > > > > pertain
> > > > > > > > > > > > > exclusively to the four higher classes of
> the
> > > Sat
> > > > > Bhai;
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > lower
> > > > > > > > > > > > > receiving only ordinary names. These numbers
> run
> > > > > thus,
> > > > > > > > > > > throughout
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the combined Order of Sikha (Apex) and the
> Sat
> > > Bhai:-
> > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sikha (Apex)-the Supreme Mundane 1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ................... 2/1 [In a circle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsors ................... 2/2 "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ................... 2/3 "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Censor ................... 3/1 3/2 3/3
> &c.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > [In a triangle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Courier .................... 4/1 &c. [In
> an
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ellipse.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Minister ................... 5/1 &c. [In
> a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > parallelogram.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Herald ................... 6/1 &c. [In a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > lozenge.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Scribe ................... 7/1 &c.
> [Plain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Auditor ................... 8/1 &c.
> [Plain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Mute .................... 9/1 &c. [Plain.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Furthermore, to distinguish these grades
> within
> > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > special
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Circles, the svmbol of each Arch Censor is
> > > prefixed
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > number of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the inferior grade in the manner shown in
> plate
> > > 1,
> > > > > > > figure 1.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4/1
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The Arch Courier 1, of Indra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > But as the A. C. has three symbols, the
> first is
> > > > > placed
> > > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Couriers, the second before the Ministers,
> and
> > > the
> > > > > third
> > > > > > > > > before
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Heralds. (11) Each member of each grade
> > > nominates
> > > > > seven
> > > > > > > > > > > assistants,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and these seven, in like manner, seven
> > > probationers;
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > these
> > > > > > > > > > > > > receive only the simple number of their
> > > superior, a
> > > > > red
> > > > > > > > > line,
> > > > > > > > > > > drawn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > horizontally through which, indicates an
> > > assistant,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > red
> > > > > > > > > > > one,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > vertically, a probationer. These auxiliaries
> > > qualify
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > become
> > > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mutes, but are not considered as within the
> > > Perfect
> > > > > > > Circle,
> > > > > > > > > nor
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > they admitted to its mysteries; they,
> however,
> > > are
> > > > > > > taught
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mystery came from Pryaya, and are employed
> to
> > > > > advance
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > cause
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > universal harmony, and their authority is a
> > > brief
> > > > > > > prescript
> > > > > > > > > > > signed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > by the immediate superior, by which their
> > > > > subordination,
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > pledged word, is secured.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (12) The Obligation, on the simple word of
> > > honour of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > candidate,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in every class throughout the combined
> Order, is
> > > > > > > accepted as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sufficient. None but men of reputed honour,
> true
> > > to
> > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > word,
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > admitted, and to such men, experience shows,
> > > that
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > pledged
> > > > > > > > > > > word
> > > > > > > > > > > > > is as inviolable as the solemn oath, the
> latter
> > > as
> > > > > > > profane,
> > > > > > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > > > > > excluded from the presence of the Lord of
> the
> > > > > Perfect
> > > > > > > > > Circle.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (13) Every member of the Order is bound to
> be in
> > > > > > > possession
> > > > > > > > > of a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > mandate or commission, signed in cipher by
> the
> > > > > Sponsors,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > endorsed in like manner, by their respective
> > > Arch
> > > > > > > Censors,
> > > > > > > > > > > according
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to the system of locked links.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (14) The Arch Censors are not necessarily
> known
> > > by
> > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > personal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > names to each other, but they may hold
> congress,
> > > > > under
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > sanction
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the sponsors, for the discussion of
> important
> > > > > matters
> > > > > > > > > > > connected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > with their own jurisdiction, and within its
> > > limits;
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dissencient voice, whether the whole be
> present
> > > or
> > > > > not,
> > > > > > > > > shall
> > > > > > > > > > > > > invalidate any regulation framed by such
> > > congress,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > veto
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Sponsors, individual as well as dual,
> will
> > > have
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > same
> > > > > > > > > > > effect,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the object being to protect the perhaps
> farther
> > > > > seeing,
> > > > > > > > > > > minority, a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > policy taught by the history of mankind.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (15) The Sponsors are to be furnished with
> > > quarterly
> > > > > > > > > reports,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > commencing on the first day of each year, by
> > > each
> > > > > > > Censor,
> > > > > > > > > who in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > like manner will- be furnished with the
> > > necessary
> > > > > > > report, by
> > > > > > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > > > subordinates, and, a return of moneys due
> and
> > > paid,
> > > > > > > shall be
> > > > > > > > > > > > > comprised in these reports, in addition to
> > > > > > > administrative
> > > > > > > > > > > details.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (16) These reports will be framed according
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > > nature of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > duties of each class thus: The Arch Censors
> have
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > superintendence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Masonic world, from 360 ° to 19 °;
> the
> > > Arch
> > > > > > > Couriers
> > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > 18
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ° to 11 %#176;;- The Arch Ministers from 10
> ° to
> > > 4
> > > > > °;
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Heralds from 3 ° to 1 °. The Arch Scribes
> are
> > > > > charged
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > fiscal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > details, the payment of fees for charters,
> and
> > > > > > > commissions
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Illuminator for materials and work
> > > supplied,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > fees
> > > > > > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > admission, and exaltation, as settled, and
> > > regulated
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Censors, the latter being charged with a
> general
> > > > > > > > > supervision.
> > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Auditors and Arch Mutes are charged
> with
> > > the
> > > > > > > collection
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > important information from all sources,
> public
> > > and
> > > > > > > private.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sponsors receive no fees, but whatever
> is
> > > voted
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Censors, they may accept.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (17) The Arch Arbiter is the highest
> judicial
> > > > > > > functionary,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > known only by his name within the Perfect
> > > Circle,
> > > > > but
> > > > > > > has no
> > > > > > > > > > > active
> > > > > > > > > > > > > part or responsibility in the Order, and is
> > > > > superseded
> > > > > > > > > > > periodically.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (18) In each case when a superior is
> addressed,
> > > he
> > > > > must
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > protected
> > > > > > > > > > > > > by his inferior against the expenses of a
> > > > > correspondence
> > > > > > > > > which
> > > > > > > > > > > must
> > > > > > > > > > > > > necessarily be of vast extent, and which
> would
> > > be
> > > > > > > oppressive
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > superior.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (19) The offices of Arch Emissary, Arch
> > > Secretary,
> > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > Historian,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Treasurer, Arch Auditor and Arch
> > > Illuminator
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > tentative,
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > first, fourth, and fifth being extra to the
> > > Order.
> > > > > Of
> > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > > patronage, the first is in the gift of the
> > > Sponsors,
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > second
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > sixth of the first Sponsor, or he who holds
> the
> > > Red
> > > > > > > Ribbon
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > Bell
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Order, the third, fourth, and fifth,
> of
> > > the
> > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > Censors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (20) Among the archives of the Order are
> many
> > > > > fragments
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > Oriental
> > > > > > > > > > > > > antiquity, and these comprise various
> documents
> > > in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > ancient
> > > > > > > > > > > > > languages of the East. When required to
> secure
> > > in a
> > > > > > > printed
> > > > > > > > > > > form,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Book of Sikha (Apex), and Legend of the
> Red
> > > > > Ribbon,
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor will receive proposals from the Arch
> > > Censors
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > > end
> > > > > > > > > > > > > in view, one grand object of the Order being
> to
> > > > > incite
> > > > > > > to a
> > > > > > > > > > > study of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the great truths contained in early Sanskrit
> > > > > literature.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (21) No member of the Order can be
> superseded or
> > > > > > > expelled,
> > > > > > > > > nor
> > > > > > > > > > > shall
> > > > > > > > > > > > > he have the power to resign his office (and
> > > never
> > > > > his
> > > > > > > > > > > membership)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > without the final sanction of the Sponsors,
> > > under
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > advice
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Arbiter, or Hindu referee.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (22) The R.O.O. of Sikha and the Sat Bhai is
> the
> > > > > only
> > > > > > > system
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Round or Natural Freemasonry.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (23) The signs and passwords of this Order
> are
> > > > > issued
> > > > > > > only
> > > > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > First Sponsor triennially, when they are
> changed
> > > at
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Vernal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Equinox. No S.B. can share in the rites and
> > > councils
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > > > > > > who is not in possession of the signs and
> > > passwords
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > smaller
> > > > > > > > > > > > > cycles. But the Illuminated who are in the
> > > innermost
> > > > > > > circle
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > exempt from ordinary rules. An Arch Censor
> may
> > > be
> > > > > > > > > Illuminated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > without preliminary perfection or maturity,
> and
> > > only
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Illuminated
> > > > > > > > > > > > > are eligible to succeed to the death vacancy
> of
> > > a
> > > > > > > Sponsor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (24) The great Lotus Seal of the Order is
> common
> > > to
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jurisdictions of the Order, but its
> custodian
> > > must
> > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > elected in
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > jurisdiction, and subject to the
> confirmation of
> > > the
> > > > > > > First
> > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (25) The Code of Sikha (Apex) is the sole
> law of
> > > the
> > > > > > > R.O.O.,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > immutable. But signs and passwords are
> tentative
> > > for
> > > > > > > fixed
> > > > > > > > > > > periods,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and bye-laws may be permitted tentatively by
> > > Rahu,
> > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > representative
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of Artiram. Nothing is valid without the
> > > personal
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > usual
> > > > > > > > > lay
> > > > > > > > > > > > > signature of the Arch Secretary to verity
> it.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (26) The Third Sponsor, as a rule, dormant,
> may,
> > > by
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > proclamation
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the First Sponsor, be called into
> activity
> > > and
> > > > > > > duality
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > him,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > whereupon the Second Sponsor becomes for a
> > > season or
> > > > > > > seasons
> > > > > > > > > > > > > dormant. No Sponsor can be also an Arch
> Censor,
> > > but
> > > > > he
> > > > > > > may
> > > > > > > > > > > > > temporarily discharge the latter's
> functions.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (27) The Vernal Equinoxes for changing signs
> and
> > > > > > > Passwords
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1877, 1875, 1878, 1881, 1884, 1887, 1890,
> &c.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (28) There are three Seals, viz. -The Great
> > > Lotus
> > > > > Seal;
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Key
> > > > > > > > > > > Seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Arch Secretary; and the First
> Sponsors
> > > Privy
> > > > > > > Seal;
> > > > > > > > > There
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > also the Arch Censors' segmental Seals.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (29) No Ritual can be used which is not
> stamped
> > > with
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Great
> > > > > > > > > > > Seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Order produced in Ashayana. So also
> > > Perfected
> > > > > > > > > Sadhanams,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Marks, and Illuminated Sadhanams are invalid
> > > without
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > said
> > > > > > > > > > > seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and the confirmation of the First Sponsor
> > > presiding
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > Ashayana.
> > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Order holds Ghonslas Ashayanas, and Nidams,
> to
> > > which
> > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > is no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > admission without Mandate or Sadhanam. The
> > > latter is
> > > > > > > > > ineffectual
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unless endorsed by the Arch Secretary in his
> > > usual
> > > > > lay
> > > > > > > > > > > signature.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (30) No Sat Bhai can resign, but absolute
> > > ignoring
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > O.B.,
> > > > > > > > > or
> > > > > > > > > > > any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > notoriously gross act of dishonour involves
> de
> > > > > facto,
> > > > > > > loss
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > rank
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to be signified by the First Sponsor and
> Arch
> > > > > Secretary.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (31) There may be more than one
> jurisdiction.
> > > That
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > First
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor is the paramount. Each may have its
> own
> > > A.
> > > > > > > Censors,
> > > > > > > > > &c.;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Segments may be exchanged.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (32) There are seven Provinces or an
> Heptarchy
> > > in
> > > > > > > England,
> > > > > > > > > > > Scotland,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and Ireland. Mahanathas rule these by
> charter
> > > under
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Great
> > > > > > > > > > > Seal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Order. The Sponsors form the Court of
> > > Appeal
> > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > these,
> > > > > > > > > > > but no
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sponsor can receive any donative or fee of
> > > intrinsic
> > > > > > > value.
> > > > > > > > > In
> > > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > > case gifts must be honorary, such as
> > > testimonials on
> > > > > > > > > parchment.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (33) 'The Feathers of the Sat Bhai',
> > > Archaeological
> > > > > > > Tracts
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > R.O.O. may be under the editorship of any
> S.B.
> > > duly
> > > > > > > > > appointed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > SYMBOLS, ETC.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The symbols, Paroles and countersigns,
> ancient
> > > and
> > > > > > > modern,
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Royal Oriental Order of Sikha (Apex) and of
> the
> > > Sat
> > > > > Bhai
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > Pryaya.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (1) The Symbols of Sikha (Apex) are:- (1)
> The
> > > > > Mundane
> > > > > > > Egg.
> > > > > > > > > (2).
> > > > > > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Crossed Square within a Perfect circle. (3).
> The
> > > > > Fruit
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Sacred
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lotus. (4). The Harmonic Octave, expressed
> by
> > > its
> > > > > > > graphic
> > > > > > > > > > > expression
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of a double shell. (5) The Anga. (6) A swan.
> (7)
> > > A
> > > > > Bull.
> > > > > > > > > [plate
> > > > > > > > > > > 1,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > figures 1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The Symbol of the
> Sat
> > > Bhai
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > Seven
> > > > > > > > > Grey
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Feathers, 2,3, and 2
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (2) The symbols of the Dual Sponsors are -
> > > (1).The
> > > > > > > Crescent
> > > > > > > > > > > Moon.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (2). The Signs of the Ascending and of the
> > > > > descending
> > > > > > > Node.
> > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > first Sponsor-- (1). The Rose. (2) The
> Kamalata.
> > > (3)
> > > > > An
> > > > > > > > > Arrow.
> > > > > > > > > > > Of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Second Sponsor--(1). An Unicorn's Horn.
> (2)
> > > The
> > > > > > > > > Amaranth. Of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dormant Sponsor--The Sun in eclipse.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The parole or pass-word to the Sponsors
> > > > > is ......... ;
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > sign,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > touching the......... of the .........
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (3) The Arch Censors are in the third yug
> > > symbolised
> > > > > by
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > Boar
> > > > > > > > > > > > > avatar (plate 1, figure 18]. Their
> distinctive
> > > > > symbols
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > three
> > > > > > > > > > > > > each:-
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Indra I A Thunderbolt 2 A Lamp 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. Ganesha 1 An EIephant 2 A Conch 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3. Agni 1 A Flame 2 A Lotus 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4. Surya 1 A Wheel 2 Sunflower 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 5. Kartikeya 1 A Peacock 2 A Sword 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6. Kama 1 A Parrot 2 A Bent Bow 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 7. Daksha 1 A Dexter Hand 2 An Ear of Wheat
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The pass-word to the Arch Censors
> is......... ;
> > > the
> > > > > > > sign,
> > > > > > > > > > > touching
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the......... of the right .........
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (4) The Arch Couriers are in the fourth yug,
> of
> > > > > which
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > symbol
> > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > a lion-headed man. They have one distinctive
> > > symbol
> > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > placed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > under their respective A. Censor's first
> symbol.
> > > The
> > > > > > > > > password to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this grade is......... ; the sign, touching
> > > > > the.........
> > > > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the......... forefinger.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (5) The Arch Ministers are in the fifth yug,
> > > > > symbolised
> > > > > > > by
> > > > > > > > > two
> > > > > > > > > > > > > interlaced triangles. They have one
> distinctive
> > > > > symbol
> > > > > > > each,
> > > > > > > > > > > placed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > under their respective A. Censor's second
> > > symbol.
> > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > password
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this grade is......... ; the sign, touching
> > > > > the.........
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the.........
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) The Arch Heralds are in the sixth yug,
> for
> > > which
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > symbol
> > > > > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > an antique crown. They have one distinctive
> > > symbol
> > > > > each,
> > > > > > > > > placed
> > > > > > > > > > > > > under their respective A. Censor's third
> symbol.
> > > The
> > > > > > > > > password to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this grade is......... the sign, the
> > > palms.........
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (7) The Arch Scribes are in the seventh yug.
> > > There
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > no
> > > > > > > > > > > symbols in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > this grade, but the A. Ss. have distinctive
> > > numbers
> > > > > in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Nagara
> > > > > > > > > > > > > character. Pass-word.......... No sign.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (8) The Arch Auditors are in the eighth yug.
> > > They
> > > > > have
> > > > > > > each
> > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Devanagri letter before their names, under
> the
> > > > > > > Minister's
> > > > > > > > > > > symbol. No
> > > > > > > > > > > > > password. No sign.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (9) The Arch Mutes are in the ninth yug:
> They
> > > have
> > > > > each
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > letter
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Devanagri character before their names
> and
> > > under
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Herald's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > symbol. No pass-word. No sign.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Nomenclature of the Arch Grades, under the
> Lord
> > > of
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > Perfect
> > > > > > > > > > > Zone,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 °:-
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Sponsor.............. Rahu
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 Sponsor.............. Ketu
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 Kamadyam......... [Dormant]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Censor Indra 1 Arch Minister
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Dhanus
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Ganesha 2 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Mesha
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Agni 3 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Vrisha
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Surya 4 " " Simha
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Kartikeya 5 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Makara
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Kama 6 " " Kumba
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Daksha 7 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Karkata
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Courier Kuvera 1 Arch Herald
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Sanjaya
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Vira Badra 2 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Heri
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Bhairava 3 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Rama
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Varuna 4 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Nareda
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Yama 5 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Agastya
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Garuda 6 " " Hotri
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Aruna 7 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Petri
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Scribe Pravaha 1 Arch Auditor Rad
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Avaha 2 " " Tara
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Udraha 3 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Nadiyan
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Samkaha 4 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Ankhen
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Vivaha 5 " " Kan
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Parivaha 6 " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Udaka
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Nivaha 7 " " Vayu
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Arch Mute Kalga fem. Narangi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 " " Pipat " Angur
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 " " Bat " Zaitun
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4 " " Champa " Seb
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 5 " " Tulasi " Angir
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 6 " " Singarhar " Badan
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 7 " " Soma " Anar
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (10) Oriental garments being disused, except
> the
> > > > > Grey
> > > > > > > Choga
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > Cap,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the only mark of membership is a red silk
> cord
> > > of
> > > > > three
> > > > > > > > > strands,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > round the neck.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The general pass-word is......... The
> colours of
> > > the
> > > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > Red,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Blue, White; those of Sponsors, Red, Blue,
> > > Yellow;
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > Segments,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Prismatic.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > MONETARY REGULATIONS
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Under the supervision of the Arch Censors,
> Arch
> > > > > > > Treasurer,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Scribes, and extra to the Order.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (1) A reserve fund for charity, and the use
> of
> > > the
> > > > > > > > > intelligence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > department, is to be formed.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (2) The Sponsors having renounced all Claim
> on
> > > the
> > > > > funds
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Order, they may accept donations as
> offerings to
> > > > > Sikha
> > > > > > > > > (Apex)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > without injury to the spiritual element, if
> > > > > voluntarily,
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unconditionally made by the Arch Censors.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (3) The Arch Censors and their subordinates
> are
> > > > > entitled
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > remuneration for actual work done. The Arch
> > > Censors'
> > > > > > > > > regulations
> > > > > > > > > > > > > must be accepted, if promulgated by the
> Seven in
> > > > > > > Congress,
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > unanimous.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4) The Arch Secretary is entitled to
> recompense
> > > for
> > > > > time
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > outlay.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (5) The Arch Illuminator is entitled to
> > > recompense
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > time
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > outlay, in preparing charters or
> commissions,
> > > &c.
> > > > > His
> > > > > > > > > charges
> > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > been allowed. For a parchment charter, if
> > > required
> > > > > > > > > illuminated,
> > > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > guinea; for a prescript or mandate, two
> > > shillings
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > sixpence;
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > for symbols of Sponsors and Censors, each
> one
> > > > > shilling.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (6) The Arch Treasurer is entitled to a
> > > percentage
> > > > > on
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > funds,
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > same to be fixed by the Arch Censors in
> > > Congress.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (7) The other Arch Officers receive
> remuneration
> > > > > > > according
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > duties
> > > > > > > > > > > > > performed, or expenses incurred.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (8) The first Occidental Arch Censors, under
> the
> > > > > > > > > dispensation of
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Lord of the Perfect Zone, have entered the
> > > Circle
> > > > > free;
> > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > > successors, and those of the grades under
> their
> > > > > > > > > jurisdiction,
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > > > required to pay the following fees to the
> Arch
> > > > > Treasurer
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Arch Censors:-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > £ s. d. £ s. d.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Mute " " A. Auditor " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Scribe " " A. Herald "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Minister " " A. Courier "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > A. Censor £ " "
> > > > > > > > > > > > > These fees may be regulated from time to
> time.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > To obviate the inconvenience of disclosing
> the
> > > > > titles of
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to the outer world, the postal address will
> > > > > > > be 'Secretary
> > > > > > > > > (or
> > > > > > > > > > > other)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the Royal Oriental S. B. Order.'
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In theos-
> > > talk@yahoogroups.com, "carlosaveline"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Carl, Tillett, Friends,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So HPB was an "honorary member" of the Sat
> > > Bhai,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > this,
> > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > > > early as 1877.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Honorary member is no active member; it
> means
> > > that
> > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > homage
> > > > > > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > made to her.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not the only one -- as she had a diploma
> > > > > > > from "Adoption
> > > > > > > > > > > Masonry",
> > > > > > > > > > > > > too.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Honorary titles.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, Carlos.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cópia:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Data:Sat, 4 Nov 2006 07:12:20 +1100 (EST)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Assunto:Theos-World HPB and Sat B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In April, 1878, HPB and Colonel Olcott
> > > discussed
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > possibility, and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > concluded that it would serve to
> > > restore "the
> > > > > vital
> > > > > > > > > element
> > > > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Oriental
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mysticism" to the higher degrees. But
> there
> > > were
> > > > > > > > > objections
> > > > > > > > > > > from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Indian
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > members of the TS, and the scheme was
> > > abandoned.
> > > > > > > > > However,
> > > > > > > > > > > both
> > > > > > > > > > > > > HPB and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Olcott were made Honorary Members of the
> Sat
> > > > > B'hai,
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > > > > > August 9,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 1877.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HPB was made a member of the sixth
> degree,
> > > level
> > > > > > > one,
> > > > > > > > > Arch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Auditor; the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > name of this degree and level was Rad,
> and,
> > > like
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > fifth
> > > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > seventh
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > degrees, was open both non-Masons and to
> > > women.
> > > > > HSO
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > made
> > > > > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > member of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the second degree, sixth level. Arch
> > > Courier;
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > degree was
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Garuda, and it was open only to Master
> > > Masons
> > > > > (as
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > degree).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In Sat B'hai the first degree was the
> > > highest,
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > seventh
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the lowest.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Royal Oriental Order of Sikha (Apex)
> and
> > > the
> > > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > > B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > > seems
> > > > > > > > > > > > > to have
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > been founded by an Anglo-Indian, Captain
> > > James
> > > > > Henry
> > > > > > > > > > > Lawrence
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Archer of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Indian Army, but the organization of
> the
> > > > > Order
> > > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > > > largely
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of the work
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Kenneth Robert Henderson Mackenzie
> (1833-
> > > 86),
> > > > > > > author
> > > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the "Royal
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Masonic Cyclopaedia" (1877), and a
> member of
> > > the
> > > > > TS.
> > > > > > > The
> > > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > public
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > statements about the Order appeared in
> > > > > > > correspondence
> > > > > > > > > > > in "The
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Freemason"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in early 1871, however although great
> claims
> > > > > were
> > > > > > > made
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > its
> > > > > > > > > > > > > antiquity
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and importance, and despite Mackenzie's
> > > efforts
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > establish
> > > > > > > > > > > it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > as a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > working organization, it does not seem
> to
> > > have
> > > > > moved
> > > > > > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > > > beyond
> > > > > > > > > > > > > being a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > plan. By January, 1879, Mackenzie had
> > > concluded
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Order
> > > > > > > > > > > > > had
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > finished.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The Sat B'hai was never adopted for use
> > > within
> > > > > the
> > > > > > > TS.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Information on the membership of HPB and
> HSO
> > > in
> > > > > Sat
> > > > > > > > > B'hai
> > > > > > > > > > > comes
> > > > > > > > > > > > > from the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > archives of the Order which were (and, I
> > > > > believe,
> > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > are)
> > > > > > > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > the Yarker
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > archives in London, where I had access
> to
> > > them.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dr Gregory Tillett
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador
> de
> > > Spam
> > > > > > > > > Inteligente
> > > > > > > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada,
> visite
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162584750.900794.6252.balcomo.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > > > > > > > > > > r,5563,Des15,Des15
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail
> > > > > Protegido
> > > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan /
> Atualizado
> > > em
> > > > > > > > > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra:
> > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have
> been
> > > > > removed]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de
> Spam
> > > > > > > Inteligente
> > > > > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162647475.70441.5840.curepipe.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > > > > > > > > r,27710,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail
> > > Protegido
> > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado
> em
> > > > > > > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra:
> > > http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> > > removed]
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam
> > > > > Inteligente
> > > > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162652147.567450.11079.arrino.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > > > > > > r,32755,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail
> Protegido
> > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em
> > > > > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra:
> http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been
> removed]
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam
> > > Inteligente
> > > > > Terra.
> > > > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > > > >
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162780372.648345.26989.baladonia.hst.terra.co
> > > > > > > m.br,41474,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido
> Terra.
> > > > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em
> > > 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam
> Inteligente
> > > Terra.
> > > > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > > > >
> > >
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162822607.447740.23059.vacoas.hst.terra.com.b
> > > > > r,48716,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em
> 03/11/2006 /
> > > > > Versão: 4.4.00/4888
> > > > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente
> Terra.
> > > > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> > >
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162877017.798290.14324.baladonia.hst.terra.co
> > > m.br,56255,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > > > >
> > > > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 06/11/2006 /
> > > Versão: 4.4.00/4889
> > > > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> > > Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> > > http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?
> +_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1162982318.570176.19001.arrino.hst.terra.com.b
> r,66836,20031127114101,20031127114101
> > >
> > > Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> > > Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 07/11/2006 /
> Versão: 4.4.00/4890
> > > Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
> > >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1163038347.822724.824.aldavila.hst.terra.com.br,81067,20031127114101,20031127114101
>
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 08/11/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4891
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application
