Frank on ULT denying occult succession.....
Oct 26, 2006 12:42 PM
by danielhcaldwell
Frank,
You write:
"...The reason is that the Adyar school never denied as ULT does,
that messengers from Shambala will follow HPB in occult succession,
Adyar only failed to recognize the true messengers and propagated
false messengers. They have tried and erred and have admitted it and
that is to be respected. ULT has never tried and erred even more...."
Quoted from: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/36606
Frank, I do think that the ULT (or AT LEAST some of the ULT
associates or THEOSOPHY editors/writers) did believe that messengers
followed HPB in succession --- occult or otherwise.
See the following two claims made in the public pages of THEOSOPHY
magazine:
". . . Masters' Messengers to the world, the Transmitters of the
Wisdom-Religion. Among These, and in our own time and country [are]:
H.P. Blavatsky, William Q. Judge, and Robert Crosbie. . . "
Theosophy magazine, November 1929.
"Robert Crosbie preserved unbroken the link of the Second [Esoteric]
Section of the Theosophical Movement from the passing of Mr. Judge in
1896, and in 1907 - just eleven years later - made that link once
more Four Square amongst men. In the year 1909 the Third Section was
restored by the formation of the United Lodge of Theosophists....
There is always one Witness on the scene. After the death of Mr.
Judge, Robert Crosbie kept the link unbroken." Theosophy magazine,
August, 1919.
Quoted from:
http://blavatskyarchives.com/crosbierobertdes.htm
So it would appear that here the claim is made that Robert Crosbie
was one of Masters' Messengers and that Crosbie kept the ESOTERIC
LINK unbroken after HPB and Judge died....
Daniel
http://hpb.cc
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application