Theos-Talk Archives (October 2006 Message tt00228)

Daniel,


Sending the same posting four or five times is part od your "tactics', it seems. 

It is also called "pollution".

I guess that's why you were called "an internet  troller"  by  Paul Johnson. Besides using false names as David Green and so on. 

Sometimes, perhaps in "critical' times, you get nervous and send the same thing five times. 

On the other hand, you also send things over and over again, with intervals of a few days, weeks or months. 


Was it Goebbels who said that a lie, repeated many times, ends up being perceived as something true? 


You will feel much better when you put truth above false victories. 


Regards,   Carlos. 







De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Tue, 17 Oct 2006 21:19:01 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Gary Barnhart's Posting: Part 3

> Dear Gary,
> 
> Your ENTIRE posting can be read at:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/36437
> 
> But I will focus in this email on what you write in the following 
> paragraph:
> 
> =====================================================
> Thus far I have observed very astute academic debate coming from you 
> in which anything and everything coming from another party is pulled 
> apart and used against them regardless of the overall context of 
> their letter. Anyone who has been in debate courses, debate 
> clubs,and academic circles recognizes those tactics and also 
> recognizes that those tactics are utilized to win by making points 
> and generally have nothing to do with establishing truth.
> ====================================================
> 
> Well, I gather that those "tactics" as your name them are 
> somehow "bad" and do not lead to the "truth" or establishing the
> "truth".
> 
> I simply take one point at a time and I give my views, giving what I 
> deem is relevant material, evidence, etc. If this leads to 
> something other than the truth, then I certainly would like to see 
> how this occurs. But without some concrete examples that you may be 
> thinking of, it is hard to say anything meaningful in the abstract.
> 
> I should point out that it is by those SAME "tactics" {your term not 
> mine!) that I have ALSO written material critiquing for example the 
> writing of Paul Johnson on the Mahatmas, on Mr. Leadbeater and his 
> teachings, etc. etc.
> 
> And in those instances, not one ULT student ever wrote me 
> complaining. In fact, those that did applauded my efforts. For 
> example, several years ago in the pages of FOHAT Jerome Wheeler 
> apparently recommended my critique of the Johnson book and said when 
> persons asked him about Johnson's book(s) he gave them a copy of my 
> critique! I assume he liked my critique...
> 
> As far as I know, I have used the same tactics in my other 
> critiques. 
> 
> See my Johnson critique at:
> 
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/johnson.htm
> 
> I can say nothing more without more specific examples.
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1161120695.917706.2369.vacoas.hst.terra.com.br,5594,Des15,Des15
> 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 17/10/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4875
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]