Theos-Talk Archives (August 2006 Message tt00087)

Daniel,


I had to laugh, physically and nicely, upon reading this sentence in 
your message:

" ( ... ) I don't believe in the Coulombs or in Soloviof. 
I believe both the Coulombs and Soloviof turned against
Madame Blavatsky and lied about her."

As a good laugh is always good for health, I must thank you. 

I will probably quote these two sentences of yours in the future!


So you do CONFESS you do KNOW you are circulating poison, false dollars, lies, SLANDERS. 



Thanks for your transparency,


Carlos. 





De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Wed, 02 Aug 2006 01:42:18 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Carlos writes: "Daniel Caldwell doesn't even have the courage...."

> Dear Carlos 
> 
> You give the following pronouncement:
> 
> "...Daniel Caldwell doesn't even have the courage to say
> that he believes in the Coulombs, or in Soloviof...."
> 
> It has nothing to do with courage for the simply reason
> that I don't believe in the Coulombs or in Soloviof.
> 
> I believe both the Coulombs and Soloviof turned against
> Madame Blavatsky and lied about her.
> 
> This belief of mine is based on my OWN study of
> the primary source documents. 
> 
> Plus Walter Carrither's OBITUARY book plus his unpublished
> material clearly shows (at least for me) that the Coulombs
> lied.
> 
> Emma Coulomb wants her readers to believe that the
> Mahatmas were but a "dummy", etc.
> 
> I believe that the testimony of the various Theosophists shows
> quite a different story.
> 
> See:
> 
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/mastersencounterswith.htm
> 
> http://blavatskyarchives.com/olcottandmahatmas.htm
> 
> I'm sure what I say matters little with you since
> you seem to live in a world of your own "misleading
> mayavic ideations."
> 
> End of discussion.
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
> 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]