Re: Tantra & Theosophy Virtual Lodge
Jul 23, 2006 10:40 AM
by bta1012003
Hi Mark:
Thanks for the passages. I thought it was only me to wonder - why
the Theosophy Virtual Lodge would sponsor a lecture on something so
blatantly opposite to HPB's teachings.
It is too bad because it gives newcomers a wrong impression on what
TS is all about.
bta
--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Mark Jaqua <proto37@...> wrote:
>
> Tantra and Theosophy Virtual Lodge
>
> I think HPB would up-chuck if she
> saw the probable orientation of This
> week's Theosophical Virtual Lodge
> presentation by Robert Corrington.
> <The focus will be on the correlation
> between psychosexuality and the
> etheric and astral bodies.>
> Corrington, it says, also has a book
> coming out on Wilhelm Reich. Reichians
> believed that the only genuine human
> fulfilment and psychological cure comes
> through the sex orgasm, a perfect one
> resulting in unconsciousness.
> This is the polar opposite of
> Blavatsky Theosophy. Below is pasted
> an article by Legros on the issue with
> quotes from Blavatsky and GdeP. I put
> it here as it isn't a likely publication
> for any current theosophical publication.
>
> THE SECRET DOCTRINE
> ON THE PROBLEM OF SEX
>
> The writer sincerely hopes that nothing
> in the following pages will strike the
> reader as "goody goody" moralizing, nor
> that he, the writer, will appear as a
> simpering "holier-than-thou" harlequin. The
> Theosophical Movement has enough comic
> figures."
> But the fact is that we are living in the
> most sexually permissive age since the fall
> of Rome, and only Theosophists or those
> familiar with the Eastern occult teachings
> know that sex is a cosmic force greater than
> nuclear bombs, representing in every human
> destiny an ultimate challenge involving
> immortality or annihilation.
> Although regular chelaship and the chastity
> it demands are several lifetimes away for most
> Messiah readers, the present is as good a time
> as any to consider what H.P. Blavatsky (the
> Masters' Messenger in the last century and
> this) has to say on the matter.
> We have no other court of appeal. One can
> expect little help from medical men,
> psychiatrists, psychologists, marriage
> counselors, priests, preachers, and educators
> because, with, of course, a number of happy
> exceptions, all are infected with the virus
> of the "New Morality" which would have us
> abandon all sexual restraints and "liberate"
> ourselves from the "unhealthy repressions"
> of our puritan ancestors.
> A refreshing exception among medical men is
> Dr. Val Davajan, chief of the reproductive
> biology section of the Medical Center at the
> University of Southern California. Says the
> doctor: "No matter what the sexologists say,
> the New Morality is immoral. And I don't care
> what the Gay Liberation people say, homosexuality
> is a perversion, and homsexuals are not normal."
> One of the latest results of the "New Morality"
> was revealed by a Gallup survey of student
> attitudes commissioned by Oklahoma Christian
> College. It was found that as students move
> along from year to year they tend increasingly
> to approve smoking, drinking, legalized
> marijuana, abortion, and pre-martial sex.
> Among freshmen, 30 percent identified their
> political philosophy as left-of-center or
> far left. By the senior year the number had
> grown to 53 per cent.
> The foregoing is an exoteric picture. the
> esoteric is something else, and we can do
> no better than begin with some highly illuminating
> material by Dr. G. de Purucker, himself an
> initiated chela and the last Leader of the
> original Theosophical Society.
>
> SEX A PASSING PHASE
> In his Fundamentals of the Esoteric Philosophy,
> pp. 342-6, he states: "...sex is but a passing
> phase in racial evolution, and, strictly
> speaking, is not normal to mankind on Globe D
> of our planetary chain. This method of
> procreation actually was copied from the
> beasts, which 'separated' before 'man'...
> As a matter of fact, the Atlantean and
> Atlanto-Lemurian karma has weighed so heavily
> upon us, the fifth race, that we are actually
> belated, and have not at the present date,
> the middle-point of the fifth race, reached
> that stage as regards the evolving of the
> physical body which otherwise we should have
> reached.
> "As it stands, however, the teaching tells
> us that at the end of our own fifth race,
> men and women will be disappearing as opposite
> sexes; and that by the middle of the Sixth
> Root Race (the race to come) men and women
> as separate sexes shall be no longer. The
> race will consist of beings who are
> physiologically neither men nor women; ...
> "The humans of that period (the Sixth Root-Race)
> will produce children by meditation and by
> will; during the Seventh Root-Race, the last
> to come on this Globe, during this Fourth
> Round - a race which to us now would seem
> glorious - the humans of that race will
> produce their kind in the same general
> manner; but by consciously exercised will
> and meditation, but still more impersonally...
> than the Sixth Race will do.
> "The main point then, here, is to realize
> that this present physiological state of
> sex is a passing racial evolutionary phase;
> and that every abuse, every misuse, no
> matter of what kind or what the world may
> think about it, is a reaction contrary to
> the evolutionary 'law'... and that while
> it is true that the present method is the
> one which nature has evolved at the present
> time, as said before it is not really the
> method which primordial humanity might
> have followed... Nature has followed that
> line, as it were, under protest, through
> the evil doing involved in our past karma,
> as the only way by which souls can find
> incarnation at present..."
>
> THE GREATEST CURSE
> We find confirmation of Dr. de Purucker's
> views in The Secret Doctrine, II, p. 216:
> "From the possession of the double principle
> in one, that is the Androgyne condition, the
> separation of the dual principle was made,
> presenting two opposites whose destiny it was,
> for ever after, to seek reunion into the
> original one condition.
> "'The curse was this, viz: that nature,
> impelling the search, evaded the desired
> result by the production of a new being,
> distinct from that reunion or oneness desired,
> by which the natural longing to recover a
> lost state was and is for ever being cheated.
> It is by this tantalizing process of a
> continued curse that Nature lives."
> In a footnote on the same page H.P. Blavatsky
> adds: "By which (human) nature lives,' not
> even the animal - but the misguided, sensual
> and vicious nature, which man, not nature,
> created."
> This is abstruse metaphysics, but establishes
> that sexual reproduction for humanity was not
> in Nature's original plan. On page 262, II,
> The Secret Doctrine, we read: "As has been
> shown in the present volume (Anthropogenesis),
> it is the speechless animal that first started
> sexual connection, having been the first to
> separte into males and females. Nor was it
> intended by Nature that man should follow
> the bestial example - as shown by the
> comparatively painless procreation of their
> species by the animals, and the terrible
> suffering and danger of the same in the women."
> Ambition is the first curse, says Light on
> the Path, but sex is the greatest, says The
> Secret Doctrine, II, p. 412: "...the fire
> received has turned into the greatest curse:
> the animal element, and consciousness of its
> possession, has changed periodical instinct
> into chronic animalism and sensuality. It is
> that which hangs over humanity like a heavy
> funereal pall." It has degraded man into a
> "helpless, scrofolous being, who has become
> the richest heir on the globe to constitutional
> and hereditary diseases, the most consciously
> and intelligently bestial of all animals."
> The deliberate profanation of sex in Atlantis
> led to the worship of the physical body (the
> Easter Island statues attest to this), and
> finally to the sex principle in itself.
> Phallic sorcery followed, with half of the
> Fourth Root-Race falling into Black Magic
> practices which survive today in African Voodoo,
> Tibetan Dugpa Lamaism, Hindu Tantrika, and various
> corrupt "New Thought" branches of Western metaphysics.
> "The question is often asked" - The Secret Doctrine,
> II, 295-6 - "Why shoulci celibacy and chastity be a
> sine qua non rule and condition of regular chelaship,
> or the development of psychic and occult powers?
> The answer is contained in the Commentary...
> During human life the greateast impediment in
> the way of spiritual development, and especially
> to the acquirement of Yoga powers, is the
> activity of our physiological senses. Sexual
> action being closely connected, by interaction,
> with the spinal cord and the grey matter of
> the brain, it is useless to give any longer
> explanation."
> IMPORTANT NOTE. At this point the writer wishes
> to emphatically state that the purpose of
> these pages is NOT to rail against marriage
> and human love nor suggest that anyone take
> the yellow robe of asceticism. Its purpose
> is solely educational and informative. It
> is believed that by knowing the esoteric
> truth about sex and mankind's Tomorrow,
> one would be better able to deal with the
> challenging human relation problems in our
> immediate experience.
> "THE "FALL OF THE ANGELS"
> The history of mankind in its present
> form as separate sexes goes back about
> eighteen million years to the middle of
> the Third Root-Race in Lemuria, when
> the Mind element began to function.
> Until then man was "an empty, senseless
> Bhuta" (form or shadow), the product of
> two streams of evolution: the Monadic
> or Spiritual, and the Physical or material.
> With the entry of Manas (Mind) a third
> stream of evolution was added, conferring
> self-consciousness and a sense of moral
> responsibility.
> The early sub-races of the Third Root-Race
> (The Secret Doctrine, II, p. 275) evolved
> by sexless creative instinct an
> "intermediate race" in which the higher
> Dhyan Chohans incarnated at the time of
> the separation of the sexes. These were
> the Sons of Will and Yoga, representing
> the full incarnation of the Mind principle.
> A second class of Ego did not incarnte
> fully at once, but chose to wait, projecting
> only "a spark." It is these (The Secret
> Doctrine, II, 167) who "constitute the
> average humanity which has to acquire
> its intellectuality during the present
> Manvantaric evolution."
> The "Sin of the Mindless" resulted when
> certain males of the "separated" humanity
> (before Manas was awakened and also before
> sterility was established between the human
> and animal kingdoms) had sexual congress
> with female beasts. Thus unconsciously the
> first misuse of the sex force took place.
> (The Secret Doctrine, II, 185). "The sin
> of the brainless or 'mindless' Races, who
> had no 'spark' and were irresponsible, fell
> upon those who failed to do by them their
> Karmic duty." Thereupon, seeing this shameful
> Karmic result, the Sons of Wisdom endowed
> all men with Manas "lest worse should happen."
> A third class of Egos deferred incarnation
> till the Fourth or Atlantean Root-Race, in
> which the worst sexual Karma was incurred
> because the Atlanteans renewed the Sin of
> the Mindless with knowledge and moral
> responsibility. It is stated (The Secret
> Doctrine, II, 302) that in this case it
> was "the Spiritual being which sinned, the
> Spirit element being still the 'Master'
> principle in man, in those days. Thus it
> is in those days that the heaviest Karma
> of the Fifth Race was generated by our Monads."
> The most significant statement of all in
> this connection is found on page 228, The
> Secret Doctrine, II: "As to those 'Sons of
> Wisdom' who had 'deferred' their incarnation
> till the Fourth Race, which was already
> tainted (physiologically) with sin and
> impurity, they produced a terrible cause,
> the Karmic result of which weighs on them
> to this day. It was produced in themselves,
> and they became the carriers of that seed
> of iniquity for aeons to come, because the
> bodies they had to inform had become defiled
> through their own procrastination.
> "This was the 'Fall of the Angels,' because
> of their rebellion against Karmic Law. The
> 'fall of man' was no fall, for he was irresponsible."
>
> CHELASHIP
> "Behold the truth before you! A clean life,
> an open mind, a pure heart, an eager intellect,
> an unveiled spiritual perception, a brotherliness
> for one's co-disciple, a readiness to give and
> receive advice and instruction, a loyal sense
> of duty to the Teacher, a willing obedience to
> the behests of TRUTH, once we have placed our
> confidence in, and believe the Teacher to be in
> possession of it; a courageous endurance of
> personal injustice, a brave declaration of
> principles, a valiant defense of those who are
> unjustly attacked, and a constant eye to the
> ideal of human progression and perfection which
> the secret science (Gupta Vidya) depicts - these
> are the golden stairs up the steps of which
> the learner may climb to the Temple of Divine
> Wisdom. Say this to those who have volunteered
> to be taught by you."
> - Blavatky's Teacher
> Theosophy teaches that we are Spiritual Pilgrims
> imprisoned by Kosmic and Karmic necessity in
> bodies of flesh informed by animal instincts
> and desires. The Spiritual Beings we essentially
> are aspire toward the god worlds from which we
> came, while at the same time the "Call of the
> Wild" would lure us back to the steaming jungles
> of animalhood.
> It is the old story of the god and beast, one
> of which must ultimately absorb our being. which
> brings us to the subject of chelaship. A chela
> is a man or woman who anticipates the crisis by
> prematurely bringing it upon himself. It means
> a terrible battle in the heart and mind between
> the two forces or polarities. Very few are ready
> for chelaship, but when one is, nothing on
> earth can stop him.
>
> In The Theosophist of July 1883 H.P. Blavatsky
> wrote: "One who undertakes to try for Chelaship
> by that very act rouses and lashes to
> desperation every sleeping passion of
> his animal nature. For this is the
> commencement of a struggle for the mastery
> in which quarter is never to be given nor
> taken... in this moral battle, if the
> Chela has one single hidden blemish - do
> what he may, it shall and will be brought
> to light... He is now in an atmosphere of
> illusions - maya. Vice puts on its most
> alluring face, and the tempting passions
> try to lure the inexperienced aspirant to
> the depths of psychic debasement.
>
> "If the candidate has the latent lust for
> money, or political chicanery, or
> materialistic scepticism, or vain display,
> or false speaking, or cruelty, or sensual
> gratification of any kind, the germ is
> almost sure to sprout; and so, on the other
> hand, as regards the noble qualities of
> human nature. The real man comes out. Is
> it not the height of folly, then, for
> anyone to leave the smooth path of
> commonplace life to scale the crags of
> Chelaship without some reasonable feeling
> of certainty that he has the right stuff
> in him? Well says the Bible: 'Let him that
> thinketh he standeth take heed lest he fall.'
> - a test that would-be Chelas should
> consider well before they rush headlong
> into the fray!"
>
> THE ANSWER OF SOCRATES
> It's a fantastic situation. Apparently when
> we were awakened to Manasic self-consciousness
> and were able to recognize our essential
> Divinity, it was in Nature's plan for us
> to carry on in an androgynous state. With
> Mind - a godlike faculty - active within
> us we deserved to live free from animality
> and beasthood.
> But something went wrong, and Nature's plan
> had to be revised. So here we are - gods
> trapped in the bodies of animals which
> too often we mistake for ourselves, with
> heartbreaking consequences.
> When Dr. G. de Purucker was asked: "Do
> Theosophists approve of marriage?" he said,
> among other things (Questions We All Ask,
> p. 137): "Theosophists most certainly
> approve of marriage, decidedly so. The
> only trouble is that so many marriages
> are 'merely farces.' Marriage itself is
> beautiful. The principle is holy; and if
> true marriage takes place, life is sanctified
> for those two human hearts."
> "When H.P. Blavatsky was asked if a man
> must marry or remain a celibate (The Key
> to Theosophy, p. 262), she replied:
> "It depends on the kind of man you mean.
> If you refer to one who intends to live
> in the world, one who, even though a good,
> earnest Theosophist, and an ardent worker
> for our cause, still has ties and wishes
> which bind him to the world, who, in short,
> does not feel that he has done for ever
> with what men call life, and that he desires
> one thing and one thing only - to know the
> truth, and to be able to help others -then
> for such a one I say there is no reason why
> he should not marry, if he likes to take
> the risks of that lottery where there are
> so many more blanks than prizes. Surely
> you cannot believe us so absurd and fanatical
> as to preach against marriage altogether? On
> the contray, save in a few exceptional cases
> of practical Occultism, marriage is the only
> remedy against immorality."
> There is the story about a young man who went
> to Socrates with the question of whether or
> not he should marry. "It doesn't matter much
> one way or another," said Socrates. "Whatever
> you do, you'll regret it."
> - G.C. Legros
> -------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs.Try it free.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
[Back to Top]
Theosophy World:
Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application