Theos-Talk Archives (July 2006 Message tt00019)

Daniel, 

Just to clarify, every slanderer styles himself as a clever guy and usually  makes a mixture of facts and fiction,  in order for his slanders to appear acceptable to people. 

Then they use the fact that "not all is false" -- in order to make their false dollars circulate...

Yet the one who circulates false dollars will not convince law agents that  "since not everything in the false dollars is false, then the false dollars should be allowed to circulate, in order for people to decide for themselves which dollars are false, and which are true!"

That is why Editors usually are responsible for what they publish. 

Got it now? 

Best regards,   Carlos Cardoso Aveline. 









De:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Para:theos-talk@yahoogroups.com

Cópia:

Data:Tue, 04 Jul 2006 01:13:59 -0000

Assunto:Theos-World Trying to Clarify Carlos' Specific Statement

> Trying to Clarify Carlos' Specific Statement
> about Using Soloviof's Book
> 
> Carlos, sometime ago you wrote:
> 
> ======================================================
> 
> Why should anyone EXCEPT a slanderer consider Soloviof a legitimate
> source of historical information?
> 
> But -- why USING Soloviof as a source if you are not a slanderer?
> 
> ==========================================================
> caps added.
> 
> So Carlos, are you saying that any writer who uses Soloviof's book
> as a legitimate source for historical information is a "slanderer"?
> 
> For example, if some writer (let us say Paul Johnson or John Algeo
> or ....) wrote a book which contains the following two quotes or
> similar quotes from Solovyoff's book, would you consider the writer
> to be a "slanderer"?? Please refer to your own words ABOVE.
> 
> Now the two quotes:
> 
> Quote One
> ===================================================
> In the latter part of 1877, H.P.B. told others that she was planning
> to go to the East. She wrote to a Russian correspondent Mr. Aksakov:
> 
> "We have now a multitude of corresponding fellows in India, and are
> proposing next year to set off for Ceylon and to settle there, as
> headquarters of our society." (A Modern Priestess of Isis, p. 277.)
> 
> ==================================================
> 
> Quote 2
> ===================================================
> H.P.B. writes about her first book ISIS UNVEILED as follows:
> 
> "Well, my book has appeared at last. My darling was born last
> Saturday, September 29th, but a week ealier my publisher had sent
> pre-publication copies to the editors of all the papers. I am
> enclosing herewith the review in the New York Herald...." (letter
> by H.P.B. to N.A. Aksakov from V.S. Solovyov's A Modern Priestess of
> Isis (London, 1895).
> 
> ==================================================
> 
> So if some writer wrote a book which contains the ABOVE two quotes
> or similar quotes from Solovyoff's book (that is, they are
> USING Soloviof as a legitimate source of historical information by
> quoting HPB's letters in MODERN PRIESTESS OF ISIS), would
> you consider the writer to be a "slanderer"??
> 
> Again I ask this in light of your own words which I quoted at the
> very first of this posting.
> 
> I am trying to clarify and understand exactly what you mean in your
> statements as given.
> 
> Daniel
> http://hpb.cc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> E-mail classificado pelo Identificador de Spam Inteligente Terra.
> Para alterar a categoria classificada, visite
> http://mail.terra.com.br/protected_email/imail/imail.cgi?+_u=carlosaveline&_l=1,1151975642.589804.24943.tulear.hst.terra.com.br,5451,Des15,Des15
> 
> Esta mensagem foi verificada pelo E-mail Protegido Terra.
> Scan engine: McAfee VirusScan / Atualizado em 03/07/2006 / Versão: 4.4.00/4798
> Proteja o seu e-mail Terra: http://mail.terra.com.br/


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]