theos-talk.com

[MASTER INDEX] [DATE INDEX] [THREAD INDEX] [SUBJECT INDEX] [AUTHOR INDEX]

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Carlos, well would Katinka H. be a "slanderer", by YOUR OWN definition ...?

May 09, 2006 08:00 AM
by danielhcaldwell


Carlos, well would Katinka H. be a "slanderer", by YOUR OWN 
definition IF she USED Soloviof's book in these two examples as "a 
legitimate source of historical information."?

See the two SPECIFIC examples at:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/theos-talk/message/33109

Remember you wrote:

======================================================
Why should anyone except a slanderer consider Soloviof a legitimate
source of historical information? 

But -- why using Soloviof as a source if you are not a slanderer?
==========================================================

Trying hard to clarify your statements and view by using SPECIFIC 
examples so there is no confusion or misunderstanding.

Daniel
http://hpb.cc









[Back to Top]


Theosophy World: Dedicated to the Theosophical Philosophy and its Practical Application