Theos-Talk Archives (April 2006 Message tt00806)

Daniel, I do not think that HPB meant that her 
esoteric information should be held private up to 
the end of the seventh round.
Withholding of esoteric information is only meant 
for a certain period of time, when the general 
mankind has developed a little bit to understand 
it.

One period of time was over in 1897. It is not 
impossible that Annie Besant was right to publish 
some of the E.S. information.
Another question would be if she did it well, 
including "correct" true information in the vol. 
III if compared with the "Wurzburg" manuscript 
(which I personally believe not)
And we have not the original manuscript (except 
the Wurzburg parts), the bulk of it which AB, 
according to Boris de Zirkoff, has had in her 
hands and went with it to an unknown place.

Perhaps in that connection it might be of interest 
that the German branch which HPB founded here was 
named TS Germania (and not TS Germany).
The Germania is the goddess which protects Germany 
and stands for her unity (which the Jesuits try to 
destroy, as HPB writes elsewhere, as the SJ were 
founded with the goal to dissiptae her, which they 
did in two 30 years wars (resulting in the 
so-called "peace treaties" of Westfalia and of 
Versailles and its dissipations).
>From all bombed towns during WWII Wurzburg was 
relatively the most destroyed city: 96 per cent of 
Wurzburg's houses were destroyed.
The German army signed the surrender on White 
Lotus Day, May 8th, the day of HPB's death. It was 
also the death of Germany and was dissipated anew.

We are not able to decide whether Besant was right 
or wrong so long as we do not have and understand 
the esoteric rules if and when which document or 
information can or must be published.
Reading the introduction of the late W. Emmett 
Small of von Purucker's E.S. Instructions, one can 
asume that such rules exists in the inner world.

The Buddha was accused of having make public the 
esoteric doctrines of the Brahmans, also Jesus was 
accused of making public the esoteric doctrines of 
the Essenes. Also Katherine Tingley was accused, 
when she gave out information of the Lodge's work 
over messengers coming from Shamballa (rejected by 
the ULT as Crosbie accepted only HPB and WQJ as 
messengers).
Also von Purucker was accused, when in 1929 he 
began to give his pupils new esoteric tenets, 
which certainly HPB also knew (as the doctrine of 
the inner and outer rounds, etc., rejected by the 
ULT).
Frank

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "danielhcaldwell" 
<danielhcaldwell@yahoo.com>
To: <theos-talk@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 9:15 PM
Subject: Theos-World What is sauce for the goose 
is sauce for the gander??


What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the 
gander??

When I publicly posted some extracts from one of 
HPB's Esoteric
Instructions, you wrote me that you strongly 
protested my posting of
these HPB quotations from an "esoteric" or 
"private" document.

You also suggested that such "posting" did an 
"injustice" to the
Mahatmas.

Therefore I assume that if other writers besides 
me did something
similar that you would ALSO object if not 
"protest" to a quoting of
this esoteric material, right?

If your answer is yes, then I call your attention 
to the following:

Read more at:

http://blavatskyarchives.com/sauceforthegoose.htm

Daniel
http://hpb.cc










Yahoo! Groups Links


    theos-talk-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com