Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt01324)

	Bart

Cass Silva wrote:

> But then the Mule is barren right?  Only a human would think about breeding a horse and a donkey to get a less productive type.   I thought Mendelian genetics was something about reverting to type?  You've lost me on this one Bart.  I thought Leon's explanation was succinct didnt you?
> Cass
>
> Bart Lidofsky <bartl@sprynet.com> wrote:  People breed animals all the time. A farmer will breed a horse to a 
> donkey, to get a mule as issue. Remember, Mendelian genetics was not 
> publicized in Blavatsky's time, and there was no term for genetic 
> alteration.
>
>  Bart
>
> Cass Silva wrote:
>
> > Whaaat?  Can you please explain.  I am sure that promiscuous connection meant offspring.
> > Cass
> >
> > Bart Lidofsky  wrote: Cass Silva wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Through promiscuous connection withn animal species lower than themselves, 
> >
> > Breeding with animals doesn't necessarily mean having sex with them.
> >
> > Bart
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> > ---------------------------------
> > New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>  
>
>
>
>
> 		
> ---------------------------------
> New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC for low, low rates.
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>