Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt01248)

Through promiscuous connection withn animal species lower than themselves, created that missing link which became, ages later, remote ancestor of the real ape as we find it now in the pithecoid family.   And if this is found to clash with a previous statement which shows the animal later than man,** then one is asked to bear in mind that the placental mammal, only, is meant.  In those days there were animals of which zoology does not even dream of in these day; and the modes of reproduction were not identical with the notions modern physiology has upon the subject.
** That which becomes man, passes through all the forms and kingdoms during the First Round and through all the human shapes during the two following Rounds.  Arrived on our Earth at the commencement of the Fourth in the present series of Life-Cycles and Races, MAN is the first form that appears, being preceded only by the mineral and vegetable kingdoms - even the latter having to develop and continue its further evolution through man.  During the three rounds to come, Humanity, like our Globe on which it lives, will be ever tending to reassume its primeval form, that of a Dhyan Chohanic Host.  Man tends to become A God and the - GOD, like every other atom in the Universe.

Vincent, all of this will be meaningless to you because you haven't put in the hard yards as far as studying the works of HPB and the Masters.  The above was taken from notes from years ago.

Cass



Vincent <vblaz2004@sbcglobal.net> wrote: Cass-

Cross breeding with who?  Apes, people, celestial spirits?

Vince

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Cass Silva  wrote:
>
> Vincent,
> The short answer is that the apes evolved from us by cross 
breeding millions of years ago.
> Cass
> 
> Vincent  wrote: Chuck-
> 
> I've not referenced that I don't believe in evolution.  Rather, 
I've 
> referenced that I don't believe that humans evolved from apes.  
> There's a difference.
> 
> I've had people attempt to show me 'proof' of a progression from 
ape 
> to human, but they didn't do a very good job unfortunately.  
Nothing 
> personal, but even various 'evidences' have multiple 
interpretations.
> 
> Do you have proof that you can present directly, or are you going 
on 
> hearsay?  What specifically in the human genome makes you think 
that 
> we evolved from apes?
> 
> To me that's no better than saying that 'I have proof that God 
> exists'.  But the data can be interpreted any number of ways, and 
is 
> often tainted by conditioned presuppositions.
> 
> A concern which arises for me about the critical thought processes 
> of people is that they are willing to question one field, but not 
> another.  They are willing to challenge what doesn't make ready 
> sense to them, yet they often never dare to question what is 
> seemingly true.  They just don't go there.  Yet much of our common 
> understanding is tainted by illusion in the first place.
>   
> Vince
> 
> --- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, Drpsionic@ wrote:
> >
> >  
> > In a message dated 3/19/2006 9:37:49 PM Central Standard Time,  
> > vblaz2004@ writes:
> > 
> > However,  I do not believe that we evolved from 
> > apes as the evolutionists do.   That seems as preposterous to me 
> as a 
> > literal interpretation of the  Bible's creation account.
> > 
> > 
> > Unfortunately the evidence of the human genome pretty much 
proves 
> it.   We 
> > can even trace our ancestry to back before the dinosaurs now.
> >  
> > Chuck the Heretic
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
>    
> ---------------------------------
>  Yahoo! Mail
>  Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>






 
Yahoo! Groups Links



 




		
---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Mail
 Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]