Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00442)

Yes.  You are right.  The dangerous practice reflected in the letter 
is a measure of Jeffrey Forth, and a good one to remember.  All of 
John Scott's correspondence has gone through his attorney.  

Krsanna

--- In theos-talk@yahoogroups.com, "M K Ramadoss" <mkr777@...> wrote:
>
> Once litigation starts, all correspondence normally go thru the 
lawyers. It
> is unusual for correspondence like the one quoted below bypassing 
the
> lawyers.
> 
> mkr
> 
> On 3/10/06, krsanna <timestar@...> wrote:
> >
> > Elizabeth Moore's response to TSA's National Secretary's letter
> > (below) was to give the letter to John Scott with a donation for
> > legal defense.
> >
> > October 31, 2005
> >
> > Dear Elizabeth,
> >
> > Hopefully this letter arrives on the same day
> > that a lawsuit filed on behalf of the
> > Theosophical Society in America is served to
> > John Scott. We find ourselves caught in a
> > most unfortunate situation.
> >
> > We regret that you are named as a defendant
> > in this lawsuit, but the attorney filing this
> > action has informed us that he must name
> > everyone who was listed as a board of
> > director or lodge officer on the letter of
> > secession addressed to the National board of
> > Directors on October 7, 2005 by John Scott.
> >
> > I would like to clarify that this lawsuit is not
> > aimed at you personally. We have a great
> > deal of respect for your contributions to the
> > Tacoma Lodge as well as those of your
> > husband. We further believe that you were
> > caught unawares of John Scott's "hidden
> > agenda" which became known to you during
> > the meeting held with Betty Bland, the
> > National President, on Saturday October 25,
> > 2005. In short, we intend to hold you
> > harmless in this legal action.
> >
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>