Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00436)

I suppose the "disaffected" members being a party to the litigation may just
be a technicality since TSA by itself may not have a standing.

TSA has a lot of experience in litigation in the past. Litigation is very
expensive.

The question that needs to be asked is: Is TSA in any way financially or
otherwise supporting the "disaffected" members in the litigation? If you
follow the money, the matter will become transparent. As always, litigation
is all about money and property, and nothing to do with theosophy.

mkr

On 3/10/06, krsanna <timestar@timestar.org> wrote:
>
> The following correspondence was published in the "Aquarian
> Theosophist," January 17, 2005
>
> BETTY BLAND'S RESPONSE TO "AQUARIAN THEOSOPHIST"
>
> To: "Jerome Wheeler" <ultinla@juno.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005
> Subject: RE: This is duplicate of letter that
> was mailed yesterday(Thursday) :
>
> Dear Jerome,
>
> I appreciate your interest.
> Considerable dialog has taken place in
> order to avert legal action. Actually the
> Theosophical Society in America is not
> filing a lawsuit. The situation to which
> you refer involves litigation by
> disaffected members of the Tacoma
> Lodge. My sincere hope is that all matters
> can be resolved without acrimony.
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>rest clipped<<<<<<<<<<<<


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]