Theos-Talk Archives (March 2006 Message tt00321)

Thank  you,  Bill,  for  a  brilliant  example  of  smart dealing with
someone's  monumental  arrogance. It's been a pleasure to feel a taste
of elegance in your words.


Wednesday, March 8, 2006, 1:16:57 AM, Bill wrote:


> carlosaveline cardoso aveline wrote:
>>
>> Dear Bill,
>>
>> I forgot to write that Paul Johson's books have a lot in common with John 
>> Algeos perspective.
>>   
> Are you saying now that you have in fact read PJ's books and are no 
> longer passing judgement based on what others have told you to think 
> about them? Good for you then. No doubt you have also sat and talked 
> with John Algeo for at least long enough to understand his perspective?
> Good for you again.



>> There is a common lack of perception about the deeper aspects of the 
>> Esoteric Philosophy.
>>   
> This is your perspective. Could you give us some specific examples from
> your interaction with Johnson's books and Algeo's perspective that we 
> could then examine for ourselves and perhaps either arrive at a similar
> conclusion as yours or a different conclusion altogether.



>> P.  Johnson (who was a Caldwell's and an Algeo's ally for years) will not 
>> discuss deep questions regarding the movement or the spiritual path.
>>   
> Have you attempted to discuss deep questions with either of these 
> individuals? Sorry, but to me it sounds like you really are saying that
> these individuals will not agree with your personally accepted answers
> to the deep questions regarding the movement or the spiritual path. If
> that is the case, feel free to add me to the list.

> Could you be more specific about your statement that Johnson, Caldwell,
> and Algeo were allies for years? I have not been privvy to any 
> information that would lead me to this same conclusion unless you mean
> that these three were allied in their desire to shed some additional 
> light on the deep questions regarding the movement or the spiritual 
> path. Also, could you provide some idea of what you mean by "spiritual
> path"? Often such a phrase is used to divide our brothers into that 
> group that is with us on "our" path and those that are not with us and
> are therefore against us because they dare to tread a different 
> spiritual path.
>> The difference is that Paul does not have a personal project involving 
>> political power in the movement. An important difference, by the way.
>>   

> Do you have a personal project involving political power in the movement?



>> Yet -- a book called "The Masters Revealed" -- that is a disaster.  That was 
>> most convenient
>> to Algeo and to Caldwell -- for a time.
>>   


> Can you explain why a book called "The Masters Revealed" is a disaster?
> Do you find it "disgusting" as well?




>>
>> Best regards,  Carlos.
>>
>>
>> peace,
>>   

> bill




>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>> From: Bill Meredith <meredith_bill@earthlink.net>
>>> Reply-To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>>> To: theos-talk@yahoogroups.com
>>> Subject: Re: Theos-World Aveline, Caldwell , Algeo & Dugpas
>>> Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 11:40:13 -0500
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> carlosaveline cardoso aveline wrote:
>>>     
>>>> oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOO
>>>>
>>>> An Adept-Teacher Explains:
>>>>
>>>> Libels Against HPB Were Made By Dugpas in Vatican and Bhutan.
>>>>
>>>> ARE DANIEL  CALDWELL AND JOHN ALGEO NOW
>>>>
>>>> CONSCIOUSLY PUBLICIZING  THE WORK OF DUGPAS?
>>>>
>>>> oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooOO
>>>>
>>>>       
>>> Another perspective:
>>>
>>> Is Carlosaveline Cardoso Aveline now perpetuating the heightened public
>>> interest in the lies published about HPB through his extensive and
>>> relentless letter writing campaign protesting against the book LETTERS
>>> OF HPB and attacking Caldwell and Algeo as agents of dugpas?  Is Aveline
>>> consciously drawing the attention of the public toward  "the libels
>>> against HPB"  and actually contributing to the increased sales and
>>> publicity of said book?
>>>
>>> Methinks he doth protest too much.
>>>
>>>